The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains
Abstract
A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains is developed. The conceptual framework is limited to the inbound logistic flow of manufacturers. The study has been performed as a two‐step process. Step one explores the concept of vulnerability from the point of view of an inductive approach. The conceptual framework is generated and based on the empirical findings from a case study of a Swedish car manufacturer in the automotive industry. Step two is deductive in terms of testing in other industries the generated conceptual framework that originates from step one. The conceptual framework consists of two dimensions, namely categories of disturbance and sources of disturbance. Principally, categories of disturbance are divided into quantitative and qualitative disturbances. Sources of disturbance are divided into atomistic (direct) and holistic (indirect) disturbances. In addition, the specific criteria of an inbound logistic flow indicate how vulnerability in supply chains is proposed to be analysed according to the developed conceptual framework of vulnerability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
Cited by
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149
Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review
Colicchia, C., & Strozzi, F. (2012) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541211246558 · Cited by 750
Abductive reasoning in logistics research
Kovács, G., & Spens, K. M. (2005) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030510590318 · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- Svensson, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 731-750
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008109438
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09600030010351444
- The paper
- Svensson, G. (2000). A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010351444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
