Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the performance effects of key‐supplier collaboration: An empirical investigation into Swiss buyer‐supplier relationships

Corsten, Daniel, Felde, Jan·2005·International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the conditions under which the proposed benefits of collaboration between a firm and its suppliers will occur. Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines buyer‐supplier relationships from the point of view of the buying firm. The paper is based on a Swiss sample of OEM‐supplier relationships. The research question is empirically tested employing a sample of 135 Swiss buyer‐supplier relationships and using structured equation modelling as well as multi‐group comparison to test for quasi‐moderation effects. In this paper it is investigated under which condition collaboration with key suppliers is beneficial for buyers. By linking collaboration with key performance measures and contrasting its effects with relational constructs like trust and dependence it is hoped to add to the growing literature on inter‐organizational relationships in supply chain contexts. Findings: The results demonstrate that supplier collaboration has a positive effect on buyer performance both in terms of innovative capability and financial results. As expected, trust and dependence play an important role in supplier relationships. Research limitations/implications: This research is based on a single country (Switzerland) multi‐industry study. Generalizability to other industries or countries may be limited. Practical implications: Supplier relationships need governance modes that balance control and relational elements. Relationship controlling is an important element in building successful supplier relationships. In order to be able to reap the benefits of collaboration for the entire company, the purchasing department needs incentives that support relationship building. Managers leading a purchasing department can learn what structural elements and processes are necessary to obtain optimal benefits from their supply base. Originality/value: From a manager's viewpoint, this paper will provide additional insight into when and how collaboration can improve financial performance, enhance innovation, and reduce transaction costs..

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09600030510611666

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Corsten, D., & Felde, J.
Venue
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
445-461
ISSN
0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1572720389
Cited by
272
References
57
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the performance effects of key‐supplier collaboration: An empirical investigation into Swiss buyer‐supplier relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09600030510611666
The paper
Corsten, D., & Felde, J. (2005). Exploring the performance effects of key‐supplier collaboration: An empirical investigation into Swiss buyer‐supplier relationships. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510611666

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.