The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health literacy as a learning outcome in schools
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to define health literacy as a learning outcome in schools, and to describe the learning conditions that are relevant for targeting health literacy. Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on theoretical and empirical educational literature, and also the experiences of the authors. Findings: Health literacy is defined as consisting of five core components: theoretical knowledge, practical knowledge, critical thinking, self‐awareness, and citizenship. The first three components are rather similar to the commonly‐accepted health literacy concept, but the definition given in this paper expands the concept via two additional – but essential – components. It is emphasized that when one is aiming to develop students' internal capacity to construct their own meanings regarding health topics, these two additional components are called for. The paper argues that one of the main aims of health teaching in schools should be to foster students' ability to define their own beliefs, identity and social relations. Moreover, if it is desired that students should become responsible citizens, acting in an ethically responsible way, competencies such as ethical reflection skills should be developed in schools. The paper also highlights the fact that the development of certain health literacy components calls for particular kinds of learning conditions. Originality/value: The paper identifies the core components of health literacy as a learning outcome and gives practical examples of means to achieve a particular target.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 · Cited by 10,197 · cited 1×
“Consequently, metacognitive knowledge is an important part of life-long learning skills (Zimmerman, 2002), an element which, it has been argued, helps students “to react in an active and flexible way in a diversity of social situations” (ten Dam and Volman, 2004, p. 376).”
BackgroundEnhancing teaching through constructive alignment
Biggs, J. (1996) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00138871 · Cited by 4,084
THE SELF-REFLECTION AND INSIGHT SCALE: A NEW MEASURE OF PRIVATE SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS
Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002) · Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821 · Cited by 772
A Typology of Youth Participation and Empowerment for Child and Adolescent Health Promotion
Wong, N. T., Zimmerman, M. A., & Parker, E. A. (2010) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9330-0 · Cited by 545
Cited by
Health Education Teachers’ Assessment Conceptions and Practices: Identifying Assessment Profiles
Paakkari, O., Paakkari, L., Haapala, H., & Hirvensalo, M. (2022) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2022.2063832 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Paakkari, L., & Paakkari, O.
- Venue
- Health Education
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-02-17
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-152
- ISSN
- 0965-4283 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976592778
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.