The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Print and Internet catalog shopping: assessing attitudes and intentions
Abstract
The use of print catalogs for direct marketing has a long history of success. Today, telecommunication networks, such as the Internet, offer the potential to reach a larger market through the use of online catalogs that could be dynamic, flexible, and consumer‐responsive. This paper reports the results of an empirical study that compared individuals’ attitudes and intentions to shop using print and Internet catalogs. The findings suggest that individuals perceived differences between the two catalog media on the shopping factors of reliability, tangibility, and consumer risk. Further, product value, pre‐order information, post‐selection information, shopping experience, and consumer risk emerged as the factors that influenced attitudes and intentions to shop using print and Internet catalogs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing
Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070397254005 · Cited by 1,373
Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
American Psychological Association (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.12.1597 · Cited by 1,362
Cited by
Retail spatial evolution: paving the way from traditional to metaverse retailing
Bourlakis, M., Papagiannidis, S., & Li, F. (2009) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-009-9030-8 · Cited by 286
Lee, H.-H., Kim, J., & Fiore, A. M. (2010) · Clothing and Textiles Research Journal · doi:10.1177/0887302x09341586 · Cited by 128
Assessing the impact of recommender agents on on-line consumer unplanned purchase behavior
Hostler, R. E., Yoon, V. Y., Guo, Z., Guimaraes, T., & Forgionne, G. (2011) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.08.002 · Cited by 117
Attitude Influencers in C2C E-Commerce: Buying and Selling
Leonard, L. N. K. (2012) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2012.11645554 · Cited by 94
A longitudinal look at rural consumer adoption of online shopping
Lennon, S. J., Kim, M., Johnson, K. K. P., Jolly, L. D., Damhorst, M. L., & Jasper, C. R. (2007) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20165 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Vijayasarathy, L. R., & Jones, J. M.
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-202
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040560015
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
