The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer satisfaction factors of mobile commerce in Korea
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to distinguish features of m‐commerce from those of e‐commerce and identify factors to influence customer satisfaction (m‐satisfaction) and loyalty (m‐loyalty) in m‐commerce by empirically‐based case study. Design/methodology/approach: First, based on previous literature, the paper builds sets of customer satisfaction factors for both e‐commerce and m‐commerce. Second, features of m‐commerce are identified by comparing it with current e‐commerce through decision tree (DT). Third, with the derived factors from DT, significant factors and relationships among the factors, m‐satisfaction and m‐loyalty are examined by m‐satisfaction model employing structural equation model. Findings: The paper finds that m‐commerce is partially similar in factors like “transaction process” and “customization” which lead customer satisfaction after connecting an m‐commerce site, but it has unique aspects of “content reliability”, “availability”, and “perceived price level of mobile Internet (m‐Internet)” which build customer's intention to the m‐commerce site. Through the m‐satisfaction model, “content reliability”, and “transaction process” are proven to be significantly influential factors to m‐satisfaction and m‐loyalty. Research implications/limitations: The paper can be a meaningful step to provide empirical analysis and evaluation based on questionnaire survey targeting actual users. The research is based on a case study on digital music transaction, which is indicative, rather than general. Practical implications: The paper meets the needs to focus on customer under the fiercer competition in Korean m‐commerce market. It can guide those who want to initiate, move or broaden their business to m‐commerce from e‐commerce. Originality/value: The paper develops a revised ACSI model to identify individual critical factors and the degree of effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284
Cited by
A SEM-neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Marinković, V., & Kalinić, Z. (2017) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.008 · Cited by 583
Wang, W.-T., Wang, Y.-S., & Liu, E.-R. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.006 · Cited by 375
Mobile marketing: A literature review on its value for consumers and retailers
Ström, R., Vendel, M., & Bredican, J. (2014) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.12.003 · Cited by 208
Consumer intentions to engage in s-commerce: a cross-national study.
Bianchi, C., Andrews, L., Wiese, M., & Fazal-E-Hasan, S. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2017.1319406 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, J., Seol, H., Lee, S., Cho, H., & Park, Y.
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-06-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-335
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965236027
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customer satisfaction factors of mobile commerce in Korea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/10662240810883335
- The paper
- Choi, J., Seol, H., Lee, S., Cho, H., & Park, Y. (2008). Customer satisfaction factors of mobile commerce in Korea. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.