The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of face‐to‐face and virtual software development teams
Abstract
Looks at new communications technologies, such as videoconferencing systems, which have enabled the creation of “virtual organizations” and “virtual teams”. Investigates the hypotheses that both “social presence” and “media richness” associated with a communication medium used to support geographically‐dispersed software development teams, will have a significant impact on team productivity, perceived interaction quality, and group process satisfaction. Results supported the predicted superiority of the face‐to‐face setting over the videoconferencing setting with regard to team productivity. They also indicated that a communication medium characterized as high in both “media richness” and “social presence” can engender a greater sense of interaction quality. There were no significant differences between the face‐to‐face and videoconferencing settings for group process satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Cited by
Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002 · Cited by 1,314
Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000520 · Cited by 520
Klitmøller, A., & Lauring, J. (2013) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.023 · Cited by 287
Team Dispersion and Performance: The Role of Team Communication and Transformational Leadership
Eisenberg, J., Post, C., & DiTomaso, N. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419827376 · Cited by 108
Interactive Effects of Team Virtuality and Work Design on Team Functioning
Handke, L., Klonek, F. E., Parker, S. K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419863490 · Cited by 88
“While the dichotomy approach contrasts virtual teams with traditional (i.e., face-to-face teams; for example, Andres, 2002; Powell, Galvin, & Piccoli, 2006), the dimensional approach sees virtuality as a continuum, with teams ranging from low to high virtuality (e.g., 8 T ab le 1 .”
BackgroundDasanayake, S., Aaramaa, S., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2019) · Journal of Software: Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2160 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Andres, H. P.
- Venue
- Team Performance Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 39-48
- ISSN
- 1352-7592 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087569123
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
