The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to provide a mature reflection upon the work of Hofstede by tracking various subtleties in the evolution of his thought and dispelling prevalent misconceptions. Design/methodology/approach: The goal of the paper is achieved by analyzing Hofstede's output from 1970 to the present day in parallel with contemporary research and criticism. Findings: The paper arrives at the conclusion that the recent expansion and update of Hofstede's doctrine is indebted to the original groundbreaking work of the 1970s yet a key strength of Hofstede's work has been its ability to adapt and remain progressive. Originality/value: The paper offers insights into the evolution of Hofstede's doctrines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134391 · Cited by 21,664
Self-citationCultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
Self-citationCulture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
Self-citation(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657288 · Cited by 4,524
The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5 · Cited by 4,380
Self-citationPundt, A. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089.50.3.167 · Cited by 3,745
Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393392 · Cited by 3,234
Self-citationBeyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994) · Cited by 2,403
Hofstede's Culture Dimensions: An Independent Validation Using Rokeach's Value Survey
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022002184015004003 · Cited by 1,541
Self-citation
Cited by
Faqih, K. M. S., & Jaradat, M.-I. R. M. (2015) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.09.006 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G.
- Venue
- Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-20
- ISSN
- 1352-7606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980794822
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 48.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13527601111104269
- The paper
- Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601111104269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.