The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi‐nozzle deposition for construction of 3D biopolymer tissue scaffolds
Abstract
Purpose: To introduce recent research and development of biopolymer deposition for freeform fabrication of three‐dimensional tissue scaffolds that is capable of depositing bioactive ingredients. Design/methodology/approach: A multi‐nozzle biopolymer deposition system is developed, which is capable of extruding biopolymer solutions and living cells for freeform construction of 3D tissue scaffolds. The deposition process is biocompatible and occurs at room temperature and low pressures to reduce damage to cells. In contrast with other systems, this system is capable of, simultaneously with scaffold construction, depositing controlled amount of cells, growth factors, or other bioactive compounds with precise spatial position to form complex cell‐seeded tissue constructs. The examples shown are based on sodium alginate solutions and poly‐ε‐caprolactone (PCL). Studies of the biopolymer deposition feasibility, structural formability, and different material deposition through a multi‐nozzle heterogeneous system are conducted and presented. Findings: Provides information about the biopolymer deposition using different nozzle systems, the relations of process parameters on deposition flow rate and scaffold structural formability. Three‐dimensional alginate‐based scaffolds and scaffold embedded with living cells can be freeform constructed according to various design configurations at room temperature without using toxic materials. Research limitations/implications: Other biopolymers may also be studied for structure formation. Studying cell viability and cellular tissue engineering behavior of the scaffolds after the cell deposition should be further investigated. Practical implications: A very useful and effective tool for construction of bioactive scaffolds for tissue engineering applications based on a multi‐nozzle biopolymer deposition. Originality/value: This paper describes a novel process and manufacturing system for fabrication of bioactive tissue scaffolds, automatic cell loading, and heterogeneous tissue constructs for emerging regenerative medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogels for biomedical applications
Hoffman, A. S. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00239-3 · Cited by 4,864
Cited by
Advances in engineering hydrogels
Zhang, Y. S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf3627 · Cited by 2,908
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
Billiet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., Cornelissen, M., & Dubruel, P. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 · Cited by 1,015
Liu, Z., Meyers, M. A., Zhang, Z., & Ritchie, R. O. (2017) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.013 · Cited by 895
Mannoor, M. S., Jiang, Z., James, T., Kong, Y. L., Malatesta, K. A., Soboyejo, W. O., Verma, N., Gracias, D. H., & McAlpine, M. C. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl4007744 · Cited by 874
Metadata
- Authors
- Khalil, S., Nam, J., & Sun, W.
- Venue
- Rapid Prototyping Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-17
- ISSN
- 1355-2546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993347357
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi‐nozzle deposition for construction of 3D biopolymer tissue scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13552540510573347
- The paper
- Khalil, S., Nam, J., & Sun, W. (2005). Multi‐nozzle deposition for construction of 3D biopolymer tissue scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540510573347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.