The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper presents an investigation into residual stresses in selective laser sintering (SLS) and selective laser melting (SLM), aiming at a better understanding of this phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach: First, the origin of residual stresses is explored and a simple theoretical model is developed to predict residual stress distributions. Next, experimental methods are used to measure the residual stress profiles in a set of test samples produced with different process parameters. Findings: Residual stresses are found to be very large in SLM parts. In general, the residual stress profile consists of two zones of large tensile stresses at the top and bottom of the part, and a large zone of intermediate compressive stress in between. The most important parameters determining the magnitude and shape of the residual stress profiles are the material properties, the sample and substrate height, the laser scanning strategy and the heating conditions. Research limitations/implications: All experiments were conducted on parts produced from stainless steel powder (316L) and quantitative results cannot be simply extrapolated to other materials. However, most qualitative results can still be generalized. Originality/value: This paper can serve as an aid in understanding the importance of residual stresses in SLS/SLM and other additive manufacturing processes involving a localized heat input. Some of the conclusions can be used to avoid problems associated with residual stresses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties
DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O., Beese, A. M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 · Cited by 8,805
3D printing of ceramics: A review
Chen, Z., Li, Z., Li, J., Liu, C., Lao, C., Fu, Y., Liu, C., Li, Y., Wang, P., & He, Y. (2019) · Journal of the European Ceramic Society · doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 · Cited by 2,109
Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing
Everton, S. K., Hirsch, M., Stravroulakis, P., Leach, R. K., & Clare, A. T. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 · Cited by 1,469
Fatigue performance evaluation of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V
Edwards, P., & Ramulu, M. (2014) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.041 · Cited by 874
Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review
Grasso, M., & Colosimo, B. M. (2017) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f · Cited by 833
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercelis, P., & Kruth, J.
- Venue
- Rapid Prototyping Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 254-265
- ISSN
- 1355-2546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072455331
- Cited by
- 2,015
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13552540610707013
- The paper
- Mercelis, P., & Kruth, J. (2006). Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610707013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.