The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping comes of age
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a personalised view by the Editors of the Rapid Prototyping Journal. Design/methodology/approach: It collects their years of experience in a series of observations and experiences that can be considered as a snapshot of where this technology is today. Findings: Development of these technologies has progressed according to application, materials and how the designers have applied their creativity to such a unique manufacturing tool. Originality/value: The paper predicts how the future of additive manufacturing will look from the perspective of three key elements: applications, materials and design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
Review of High-Performance Sustainable Polymers in Additive Manufacturing
Chyr, G., & DeSimone, J. M. (2023) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2gc03474c · Cited by 136
A 3D Food Printing Process for the New Normal Era: A Review
Lee, J. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9091495 · Cited by 112
Orme, M. E., Gschweitl, M., Ferrari, M., Madera, I., & Mouriaux, F. (2017) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4037304 · Cited by 92
Raffaeli, R., Lettori, J., Schmidt, J., Peruzzini, M., & Pellicciari, M. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11031210 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, I., Bourell, D., & Gibson, I.
- Venue
- Rapid Prototyping Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-06-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 255-258
- ISSN
- 1355-2546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066737743
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
