The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CSR expectations: the focus of corporate marketing
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the link between individuals' expectations of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and their readiness to support the socially responsible behaviour of companies in light of the expectational relationship a company has with its stakeholders, as defined in the corporate marketing model. Design/methodology/approach: The data were collected using an online survey of 354 respondents from different backgrounds. The sample was 57 per cent female and 43 per cent male with 66 per cent of respondents aged between 20 and 40 years. The authors conducted descriptive statistics, a factor analysis, and structural equation modelling. Findings: The results show that expectations of ethical‐philanthropic CSR tend to have a significant positive influence on both types of intended CSR support by customers. Research limitations/implications: The limitation of the research is the limited scope of the model. For more insight into the relevance of CSR for corporate marketing, it would be interesting to include other relevant variables from this field, such as identification with a corporate brand and corporate reputation. Practical implications: The model suggests that ethical‐philanthropic responsibilities seem to lead to a competitive advantage which is based on a desired customer response and reward. This is in line with the main focus of corporate marketing, which is the meeting of stakeholder and societal needs. Originality/value: The paper empirically considers and challenges the acknowledged Carroll's classification of CSR, and links it with the readiness to support socially responsible behaviour of companies in general. In addition, it links the notion of CSR with that of corporate marketing, which strives to develop meaningful relationships with customers and other stakeholders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000006155 · Cited by 2,974
Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs
Ellen, P. S. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305284976 · Cited by 1,591 · cited 1×
“This supports the arguments of authors that an evaluation and support of a company and its actions rest in part on the associations with altruistic (or selfish) motives of a company ( Scholder Ellen et al. , 2006”
Result
Cited by
Consumer Perceptions of the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility
Stanaland, A. J. S., Lwin, M. O., & Murphy, P. E. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0904-z · Cited by 516
Peschel, A. O., & Aschemann-Witzel, J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122884 · Cited by 110
Pérez, A., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2013) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20654 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Podnar, K., & Golob, U.
- Venue
- Corporate Communications: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-10-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 326-340
- ISSN
- 1356-3289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078197296
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CSR expectations: the focus of corporate marketing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13563280710832498
- The paper
- Podnar, K., & Golob, U. (2007). CSR expectations: the focus of corporate marketing. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280710832498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.