The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review a sample of the literature relating to the integration and implementation of supply chain management practices from a strategic viewpoint. Design/methodology/approach: The literature is examined from three perspectives. First, supply chain integration covers issues relating to integration of core processes across organizational boundaries through improved communication, partnerships, alliances and cooperation. Second, strategy and planning examines supply chain management as a strategic matter for trading partners, along with factors relating to the amount of planning required. Third, implementation issues concern factors critical for successful implementation, as well as issues specific to inter and intra‐organizational aspects of supply chain initiatives are contained in this sub‐group Findings: An important emergent theme from the literature is the importance of taking a holistic view, and the systemic nature of interactions between the participants. At the same time, it is also apparent that this requirement to take such an holistic and systemic view of the supply chain acts as an impediment to more extensive implementation. The strategic nature of adopting a supply chain wide perspective, on the one hand provides significant potential benefit, and on the other requires trading partners to think and act strategically. This is easier said than done within a stand‐alone organization, let alone across a diverse and dispersed group of trading partners. Research limitations/implications: The scope of this review is by design limited to a cross‐section of the literature in this area. As such, it cannot, and does not, attempt to be an examination of the full range of the literature, but a sampling of important and influential works. Practical implications: This review of the literature serves to highlight the inter‐dependence between integration (technologies, logistics, and partnerships), a strategic view of supply chain systems, and implementation approach. All three need to inform and underpin each other in order for management of supply chains to be able to deliver on the promise of benefits for all trading partners. Originality/value: This study reviews a sample of recent and classic literature in this field, and in doing so provides some clear guidelines for the conduct of future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nandi, M. L., Nandi, S., Moya, H., & Kaynak, H. (2020) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2019-0444 · Cited by 269
Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance
Tortorella, G. L., Miorando, R., & Marodin, G. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.006 · Cited by 166
Supply Chain Coordination under Uncertainty
(2011) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19257-9 · Cited by 95
Data supply chain (DSC): Research synthesis and future directions
Spanaki, K., Gürgüç, Z., Adams, R., & Mulligan, C. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1399222 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Power, D.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 252-263
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981637880
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598540510612721
- The paper
- Power, D. (2005). Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510612721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.