Cited by 385Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementQuality and Supply Management

Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government

Open access
Preuss, Lutz·2009·Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose While the contribution of supply chain management to sustainability is receiving increasing attention in the private sector, there is still a scarcity of parallel studies of public procurement. Hence the purpose of this paper is to explore the ways in which local government authorities in England use their procurement function to foster sustainable development. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses an exploratory approach. Based on a review of the existing literature, qualitative research into leading local government authorities is undertaken to draw out the multiple ways in which public procurement can support sustainable development. Findings At an aggregate level, local government procurers have adopted a wide range of initiatives to address all three aspects of sustainability. These are condensed into a typology of sustainable supply chain management for the public sector. Research limitations/implications The study highlights the importance of supporting factors, like transparency, organisational culture and strategy as well as leeway in public policy, for sustainable supply chain management in the public sector. Practical implications The experience of the best practice local authorities deserves wider recognition among practitioners, policy makers and academic researchers, not least given the objective of the UK government to be among the leaders in the European Union on sustainable procurement by 2009. Originality/value The proposed typology of sustainable supply chain management for the public sector can serve as a basis for future research in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13598540910954557

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 385

Authors
Preuss, L.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Preuss, Lutz
Venue
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
213-223
ISSN
1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024632757
Cited by
385
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
35.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
public procurement, sustainable development, local government, sustainable supply chain management, public sector sustainability, transparency, organizational culture, England

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review