The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility through a multi‐disciplinary review of the relevant research. The systematic literature review aims to provide the basis for formulating a conceptual framework of the relationship. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic, comprehensive review of the literature on manufacturing, organizational and supply chain agility from 1991 through 2010 was conducted. The literature on logistics capabilities was also examined to identify the various elements that contribute to supply chain agility. Findings: Supply chain agility has primarily been explored in the literature through a focus on manufacturing flexibility, supply chain speed, or lean manufacturing. The role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility has not been addressed from a holistic conceptual perspective. This research addresses that gap using a multi‐disciplinary approach. As such, it is the first phase in theory building on the concept of supply chain agility. Further research is needed to empirically test the conceptualized relationships. Research limitations/implications: This research is a systematic, integrative review of the existing literature on the concept of agility and logistics capabilities. As such, the next phase of research needed for theory building will be the operationalization of constructs and testing of the hypothesized relationships proposed by the conceptual framework. Practical implications: The level of agility in a supply chain can determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the collective efforts. It is important that firms become more knowledgeable about the role of logistics capabilities in achieving agility. Originality/value: Through a systematic, comprehensive review of the literature in four distinct areas, the paper explores the relationship between logistics capabilities and supply chain agility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241
The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations
Day, G. S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800404 · Cited by 6,510
DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x · Cited by 5,121
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534
The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130505 · Cited by 3,392
Issues in Supply Chain Management
Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00113-3 · Cited by 3,099
Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393616 · Cited by 2,465
Looking inside for competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (1995) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.1995.9512032192 · Cited by 2,141
(2009) · Cited by 2,062
Cited by
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766
“In general, the term “maturity” refers to a “state of being complete, perfect, or ready” [1 1] and implies some progress in the development of a system.”
BackgroundZhao, G., Liu, S., Lopez, C., Lu, H., Elgueta, S., Chen, H., & Boshkoska, B. M. (2019) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002 · Cited by 731
Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.970707 · Cited by 581
Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile?
Gligor, D. M., Esmark, C. L., & Holcomb, M. C. (2015) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.008 · Cited by 511
Self-citationDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Childe, S. J. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2018-0119 · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 438-453
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092266470
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598541211246594
- The paper
- Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
