The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Abstract Purpose – To make their supply chains more socially responsible, many companies are implementing supplier assessment tools and collaborative practices. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic literature review on the governance structures used to extend sustainability to suppliers. More specifically, the authors aim to answer two questions: "What is the impact of these mechanisms or governance structures on sustainable performance?" and "What are the enablers of these mechanisms?". Design/methodology/approach – A structured literature review is carried out that analyses published studies, evaluates contributions, summarises knowledge and identifies managerial implications and lines for further research. Findings – Both assessment and collaboration have a positive impact on environmental performance and corporate social responsibility, although the most recent collaborative paradigm stresses that assessment alone is not enough. Some enablers of these practices are identified. Research limitations/implications – Although the authors believe that the right search terms have been used, the choice of these terms could be a limitation of this study. Also, the selection of the articles could be considered subjective, although the papers were reviewed by two researchers. Practical implications – Supplier assessment and collaboration are effective in improving sustainability. However, the results also indicate that assessment alone is not enough. Firms also need to adopt a collaborative approach. Finally, a list of enablers to implement these practices is provided. Originality/value – The paper summarises knowledge related to the impact of supplier assessment and collaboration on sustainability, and describes the enablers of such initiatives, providing some managerial implications and lines for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach
Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013 · Cited by 544
Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001 · Cited by 539
Circular Economy in the building sector: Three cases and a collaboration tool
Leising, E., Quist, J., & Bocken, N. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010 · Cited by 527
Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340 · Cited by 445
Towards a theory of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: A systematic literature review
M. Tachizawa, E., & Yew Wong, C. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-02-2014-0070 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-08-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 531-543
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084341533
- Cited by
- 732
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598541211258591
- The paper
- Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.