The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The scope of supply chain management research
Abstract
Advocates an expanded scope for supply chain management research which accounts for the social function and the political and economic implications of supply chain developments. Argues that the research agenda must not be driven by the notion of efficiency alone, but should also be developed around the concept of the just supply chain. Provides a framework which sets out the range of issues which may contribute to this approach. Believes that the objectives and ideological assumptions of research need to be open to challenge and debate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kache, F., & Seuring, S. (2017) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2015-0078 · Cited by 938
A framework of supply chain management literature
Tan, K. C. (2001) · European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management · doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(00)00020-4 · Cited by 895
Metadata
- Authors
- New, S. J.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-22
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148503527
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The scope of supply chain management research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598549710156321
- The paper
- New, S. J. (1997). The scope of supply chain management research. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549710156321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
