CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Perceptions of neighborhood problems and their solutions: implications for community policing

Open access
Bohm, Robert M., Reynolds, K. Michael, Holmes, Stephen T.·2000·Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management
DOI 10.1108/13639510010355459
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This exploratory study tests one of the key assumptions of community policing: that there is a relatively high level of consensus both within and between community groups, or stakeholders, about community problems and potential solutions. Results show that in the target community there is some consensus about social problems and their solutions. However, the study also reveals that the consensus may not be community‐wide, but may exist only among a relatively small group of “active” stakeholders who differ significantly about the seriousness of most of the problems and the utility of some solutions. Implications for community policing are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13639510010355459

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bayley, D.H. (1991), “Community policing: a report from the devil’s advocate”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 225‐37.
  2. Cordner, G.W. (1991), “A problem‐oriented approach to community‐oriented policing”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 135‐52.
  3. Eck, J.E. (1997), “Preventing crime at places”, Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising, University of Maryland, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC, pp. 7‐1‐7‐62.
  4. Farrell, M.J. (1991), “The development of the Community Patrol Officer Program: community‐oriented policing in the New York City police department”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 73‐88.
  5. Goldstein, H. (1987), “Toward community‐oriented policing: potential, basic requirements and threshold questions”, Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 33, pp. 6‐30. · DOI
  6. Greene, J.R. and Taylor, R.B. (1991), “Community‐based policing and foot patrol: issues of theory and evaluation”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 195‐223.
  7. Hartnett, S.M. and Skogan, W.G. (1999), “Community policing: Chicago’s experience”, National Institute of Justice Journal, April, pp. 2‐11. · DOI
  8. Kelling, G.L. (1985), “Order maintenance, the quality of urban life, and police: a different line of argument”, in Geller, W. (Ed.), Police Leadership in America: Crisis and Opportunity, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 296‐309.
  9. Klockars, C.B. (1991), “The rhetoric of community policing”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 239‐58.
  10. McGarrell, E.F., Giacomazzi, A.L. and Thurman, Q.C. (1997), “Neighborhood disorder, integration, and the fear of crime”, Justice Quarterly, Vol. 14, pp. 479‐97. · DOI
  11. Manning, P.K. (1984), “Community policing”, American Journal of Police, Vol. 3, pp. 205‐27.
  12. Manning, P.K. (1991), “Community policing as a drama of control”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 27‐45.
  13. Mastrofski, S.D. (1991), “Community policing as reform: a cautionary tale”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 47‐67.
  14. Moore, M. and Kelling, G.L. (1983), “To serve and protect: learning from police history”, Public Interest, Vol. 70, pp. 49‐65.
  15. Murphy, C. (1988), “Community problems, problem communities, and community policing in Toronto”, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 25, pp. 392‐410. · DOI
  16. Murphy, C. (1991), “The development, impact, and implications of community policing in Canada”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 177‐89.
  17. Oettmeier, T.N. and Brown, L.P. (1991), “Developing a neighborhood‐oriented policing style”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 121‐34.
  18. Sampson, R.J. (1987), “Urban black violence: the effect of male joblessness and family disruption”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, pp. 348‐82. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Sherman, L.W. (1997), “Thinking about crime prevention”, Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising, University of Maryland, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC, pp. 2‐1‐2‐32.
  20. Skogan, W.G. (1990), Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  21. Skogan, W.G. (1996), “The community’s role in community policing”, National Institute of Justice Journal, No. 231, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, August, Washington, DC.
  22. Skolnick, J.H. and Bayley, D.H. (1986), The New Blue Line: Police Innovation in Six American Cities, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  23. Taylor, R.W., Fritsch, E.J. and Caeti, T.J. (1998), “Core challenges facing community policing: the emperor still has no clothes”, ACJS Today, Vol. 17, May/June, pp. 1‐5.
  24. US Department of Justice (1992), “Community policing in the 1990s”, National Institute of Justice Journal, Office of Justice Programs, No. 225, August, Washington, DC.
  25. Wilson, J.Q. and Kelling, G.L. (1982), “The police and neighborhood safety: broken windows”, Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 127, pp. 29‐38.
  26. Weatheritt, M. (1991), “Community policing: rhetoric or reality?”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 153‐75.
  27. Wycoff, M.A. (1991), “The benefits of community policing: evidence and conjecture”, in Greene, J.R. and Mastrofski, S.D. (Eds), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, Praeger, New York, NY, pp. 103‐20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bohm, R. M., Reynolds, K. M., & Holmes, S. T.
Affiliations
University of Central Florida (US)
ORCID
Venue
Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
439-465
ISSN
1363-951X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/13639510010355459
OpenAlex
W1991587678
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • Policing An International Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
community policing, stakeholder consensus, neighborhood problems, community perceptions, social problems, problem solutions, community organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review