The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The future of knowledge management: an international delphi study
Abstract
The field of knowledge management (KM) is highly estimated in research and practice but at the same time relatively diffuse and scattered into diverging concepts, perspectives and disciplines. On that background, it was the aim of this delphi study to give more structure to the field of KM and to get an outlook on worthwhile developments for the next ten years. International experts of KM from natural/technical and social/business sciences as well as practicians of KM with a similar background were asked some basic questions onto the future of KM in two rounds. According to the experts, the future of knowledge management lies in a better integration into the common business processes, a concentration on the human‐organization‐interface and a better match of IT‐aspects to human factors whereas IT‐aspects rank low on this agenda. There are no broadly agreed theoretical approaches though something can be gained from the related organizational learning field; in general much more interdisciplinary and empirical research is needed. There are also almost no broadly agreed practical approaches besides communities of practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation
Blackler, F. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600605 · Cited by 2,498
Cited by
Harmonisation of knowledge management – comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe
Heisig, P. (2009) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270910971798 · Cited by 615
Self-citationTrust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice
Usoro, A., Sharratt, M. W., Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Scholl, W., König, C., Meyer, B., & Heisig, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 19-35
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012140078
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The future of knowledge management: an international delphi study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13673270410529082
- The paper
- Scholl, W., König, C., Meyer, B., & Heisig, P. (2004). The future of knowledge management: an international delphi study. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410529082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.