The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the extent to which knowledge sharing and organizational learning affect organizational effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach: The research samples have been drawn from all levels of employees in the organizational hierarchy of international tourist hotels in Taiwan. The questionnaires were distributed to 1,200 participants across nine international tourist hotels in Taiwan. These hotels are globally managed or franchised by international groups of hotels and resorts. Findings: Of 499 usable questionnaires, the results suggest that knowledge sharing would facilitate the transformation of collective individual knowledge to organizational knowledge without the existence of orphaned knowledge and knowledge depreciation. Furthermore, this would result in the advancement of organizational learning and eventually, the enrichment of organizational effectiveness. Practical implications: The more individual intellectual capital is transferred to organizational assets, the greater the degree of strength of organizational capabilities will become. If organizations do not implant mechanisms for storing that all employees collectively learn, effects are not enduring. There would furthermore be a limited contribution to organizational learning. Originality/value: This study contributes to KM literature that suffers from a paucity of research on the empirical examination of this subject.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.001.0001 · Cited by 10,965
Comparative research methodology: Cross‐cultural studies
Brislin, R. W. (1976) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207597608247359 · Cited by 832
Cited by
Naqshbandi, M. M., & Tabche, I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017 · Cited by 308
Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review
Basten, D., & Haamann, T. (2018) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244018794224 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-04-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-90
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989408244
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13673270710738933
- The paper
- Yang, J. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710738933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.