The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise
Teece, D. J. (2014) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.54 · Cited by 1,300
OPEN VERSUS CLOSED INNOVATION: A MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND DIVERGENCE.
ALMIRALL, E., & CASADESUS-MASANELL, R. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.45577790 · Cited by 533
Opening Strategy: Evolution of a Precarious Profession
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis‐Douglas, B. (2011) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00762.x · Cited by 458
Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2697 · Cited by 359
Community‐Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation
Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00565.x · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Venue
- European Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-326
- ISSN
- 1460-1060 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1551905080
- Cited by
- 2,806
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14601060410565074
- The paper
- Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. (2004). European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
