The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of business process orientation on financial and non‐financial performance
Abstract
Purpose: Extensive literature on business process management suggests that organizations could enhance their overall performance by adopting a process view of business. However, there is a lack of empirical research in this field. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the understanding of the process view and process maturity levels in a transition economy and to test the impact of process orientation maturity level on organizational performance. Design/methodology/approach: Empirical investigation combined an exploratory‐confirmatory approach using factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Findings: The investigation confirms the impact of business process orientation on organizational performance in a transition economy. The link is even stronger than in the original investigation. The results show that business process orientation leads to better non‐financial performance and indirectly to better financial performance. Practical implications: The research confirms that business process orientation is advantageous for companies since it has a positive influence on organizational performance. The finding that the impact on financial performance is indirect through non‐financial performance suggests that the companies have to take that view of performance into consideration as well. Originality/value: The paper is valuable for academics and practitioners because the impact of business process orientation on organizational performance has been confirmed for a transitional economy. Its originality is in the measurement of organizational performance, for which a more detailed specification of organizational performance based on the balanced scorecard concept that includes non‐financial performance measures has been used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance
Caplan, R. S. (1992) · Harvard business review · Cited by 12,085
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Clogg, C. C., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580595 · Cited by 8,211
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 7,979
Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80064-3 · Cited by 6,455
Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996) · Harvard business review · Cited by 5,015
Johnsen, E. (1964) · Ledelse & erhvervsøkonomi · Cited by 4,989
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315827506 · Cited by 4,546
Metadata
- Authors
- Škrinjar, R., Bosilj‐Vukšić, V., & Indihar‐Štemberger, M.
- Venue
- Business Process Management Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-09-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 738-754
- ISSN
- 1463-7154 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019007610
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 23.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of business process orientation on financial and non‐financial performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14637150810903084
- The paper
- Škrinjar, R., Bosilj‐Vukšić, V., & Indihar‐Štemberger, M. (2008). The impact of business process orientation on financial and non‐financial performance. Business Process Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810903084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.