The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory
Abstract
This paper analyzes recent efforts to measure sustainability in higher education across institutions. The benefits of cross‐institutional assessments include: identifying and benchmarking leaders and best practices; communicating common goals, experiences, and methods; and providing a directional tool to measure progress toward the concept of a “sustainable campus”. Ideal assessment tools identify the most important attributes of a sustainable campus, are calculable and comparable, measure more than eco‐efficiency, assess processes and motivations and are comprehensible to multiple stakeholders. The 11 cross‐institutional assessment tools reviewed in this paper vary in terms of stage of development and closeness to the “ideal tool”. These tools reveal (through their structure and content) the following critical parameters to achieving sustainability in higher education: decreasing throughput; pursuing incremental and systemic change simultaneously; including sustainability education as a central part of curricula; and engaging in cross‐functional and cross‐institutional efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth
Bazan, G. (1997) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g31710273 · Cited by 4,654
Driving Eco-Innovation: A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability
Fussler, C., & James, P. (1996) · Cited by 643
Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of sustainability
Leal Filho, W. (2000) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/1467630010307066 · Cited by 467
Worthen, J. E. (1999) · Cardinal Scholar (Ball State University) · Cited by 113
Environmental management systems at North American universities: What drives good performance?
Herremans, I. M., & Allwright, D. E. (2000) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/1467630010371902 · Cited by 86
Education for Sustainability: The Need for a New Human Perspective.
Cortese, A. D. (1999) · Cited by 42
Cited by
Lambrechts, W., Mulà, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Gaeremynck, V. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.034 · Cited by 503
The state of sustainability reporting in universities
Lozano, R. (2011) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/14676371111098311 · Cited by 494
Lozano, R. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.005 · Cited by 422
Yarime, M., Trencher, G., Mino, T., Scholz, R. W., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Frantzeskaki, N., & Rotmans, J. (2012) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0157-5 · Cited by 317
Watson, M. K., Lozano, R., Noyes, C., & Rodgers, M. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.010 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Shriberg, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 254-270
- ISSN
- 1467-6370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1597034787
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14676370210434714
- The paper
- Shriberg, M. (2002). Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370210434714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.