The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social benefits of urban green space: A conceptual framework of valuation and accessibility measurements
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the topic “urban green space” focusing on its social benefits and measure techniques in terms of monetary value and accessibility. It suggests potential research direction by using an integrated valuation and measurement framework, and concludes that urban green space valuation in the providers’ perspective as well as accessibility analysis in the consumers’ perspective are useful tools that provide significant measure techniques in urban green space planning. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses a systematic approach to build up a conceptual framework that quantifies social benefits of green space from provider and consumer perspectives. The literature review indicates some limitations of existing techniques of valuation and accessibility analyses, which entails an integrated model of measurements. Findings: The paper explores social benefits of urban green space, which includes recreational opportunities, aesthetic enjoyments, adjusting psychological well‐being and physical health, enhancing social ties, and providing educational opportunities. To analyze existing evaluation and measure techniques of urban green space, the paper points out that a single measurement only evaluates certain aspects of urban green space, which may not always be suitable to comprehensively assess social benefits from both providers’ and consumers’ perspectives. Considering this limitation, the paper offers an integrated model to measure urban green space that may deal with current limitations. Originality/value: The originality of the study resides in designing an integrated model including valuation and measure techniques. It certainly offers an important avenue to evaluate social benefits of urban green space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions
Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005 · Cited by 3,353
Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00109-3 · Cited by 2,118
de Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a35111 · Cited by 1,258
A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces
Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00192-5 · Cited by 717
‘Cultivating health’: Therapeutic landscapes and older people in northern England
Milligan, C., Gatrell, A., & Bingley, A. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00397-6 · Cited by 571
Sustainable Urban Development Reader
(2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315770369 · Cited by 364
Woodland spaces and edges: Their impact on perception of safety and preference
Jorgensen, A., Hitchmough, J., & Calvert, T. (2002) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00052-x · Cited by 329
Physical activity decreases cardiovascular disease risk in women
Oguma, Y., & Shinoda-Tagawa, T. (2004) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.007 · Cited by 323
Health levels influenced by urban residential conditions in a megacity—Tokyo
Tanaka, A., Takano, T., Nakamura, K., & Takeuchi, S. (1996) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420989650011645 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Nutsford, D., Pearson, A. L., & Kingham, S. (2013) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.016 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, X., & Parves Rana, M.
- Venue
- Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-02-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-189
- ISSN
- 1477-7835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1542546852
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social benefits of urban green space: A conceptual framework of valuation and accessibility measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14777831211204921
- The paper
- Zhou, X., & Parves Rana, M. (2012). Social benefits of urban green space: A conceptual framework of valuation and accessibility measurements. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211204921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.