The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lean viewed as a philosophy
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to act as a meticulous conceptual paper probing the contemporary view towards lean and illustrate that, despite its discernible benefits, the implementation record suffers as the prevailing opinion fails to encapsulate that an aspiring lean enterprise shall only succeed if it views lean as a philosophy rather than another strategy. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on a thorough literature search concerning the success and failure of lean implementations and acts as a precursor for one of the authors utilising a combination of methodologies; namely, interviewing, survey questionnaire and participant observation in attempting to prove his PhD hypothesis. Findings: Evidently, a cocktail of factors are needed for lean success; not only is it necessary to implement most of the technical tools but an organisation's culture needs transforming too. Furthermore, the alterations need to be implemented throughout an organisation's value chain. Lean has a major strategic significance, though its implementation procedure, HRM implications, general approach to the supplier base coupled with the overall universal conviction of viewing lean as a set of tactics rather than embracing it as a philosophy advocates that this contributes to the relatively low number of successful lean initiatives. Originality/value: The paper would prove invaluable to lean practitioners through its summation of the intricacies towards lean enterprise success and academic researchers by focusing their attention towards the necessary cultural implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The machine that changed the world
(1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90400-v · Cited by 5,805
Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production
Ohno, T., & Rosen, C. B. (1998) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 4,522
Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 · Cited by 3,259
(2004) · Cited by 3,245
(1986) · Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research · doi:10.4135/9781412985659.n2 · Cited by 1,375
Reliability and validity in research
Roberts, P., Priest, H., & Traynor, M. (2006) · Nursing Standard · doi:10.7748/ns.20.44.41.s56 · Cited by 659
Assessing changes towards lean production
Karlsson, C., & Åhlström, P. (1996) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579610109820 · Cited by 621
Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage
Lewis, M. A. (2000) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570010332971 · Cited by 578
(2019) · CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53120-4_300754 · Cited by 494
Lean indicators and manufacturing strategies
Martínez Sánchez, A., & Pérez Pérez, M. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570110407436 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
Lean production: literature review and trends
Jasti, N. V. K., & Kodali, R. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.937508 · Cited by 485
The impact of lean methods and tools on the operational performance of manufacturing organisations
Belekoukias, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2014) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.903348 · Cited by 474
Lean, six sigma and lean sigma: fads or real process improvement methods?
Näslund, D. (2008) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150810876634 · Cited by 358
A literature review of lean manufacturing
Gupta, S., & Jain, S. K. (2013) · International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management · doi:10.1080/17509653.2013.825074 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhasin, S., & Burcher, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-72
- ISSN
- 1741-038X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074839553
- Cited by
- 872
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 28.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lean viewed as a philosophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17410380610639506
- The paper
- Bhasin, S., & Burcher, P. (2006). Lean viewed as a philosophy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610639506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.