CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Profiling research published in the Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM)

Open access
Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Mustafee, Navonil·2010·Journal of Enterprise Information Management
DOI 10.1108/17410391011008888
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse research published in the Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) in the last ten years (1999‐2008). Design/methodology/approach: Employing a profiling approach, the analysis of the 381 JEIM publications includes examining variables such as the most active authors, geographic diversity, authors' backgrounds, co‐author analysis, research methods and keyword analysis. Findings: All the findings are in relation to the period of analysis (1999‐2008). Research categorised under descriptive, theoretical and conceptual methods is the most dominant research approach followed by JEIM authors. This is followed by case study research. The largest proportion of contributions comes from researchers and practitioners with an information systems (IS) background, followed by those with a background in business and computer science and IT. The keyword analysis suggests that “IS”, “electronic commerce”, “internet”, “logistics”, “supply chain management”, “decision making”, “small to medium‐sized enterprises”, “information management”, “outsourcing” and “modelling” are the most frequently investigated keywords. The paper presents and discusses the findings obtained from the citation analysis that determines the impact of the research published in JEIM. Originality/value: The primary value of this paper lies in extending the understanding of the evolution and patterns of IS research. This has been achieved by analysing and synthesising existing JEIM publications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17410391011008888

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Allen, E. and Fjermestad, J. (2001), “E‐commerce marketing strategies: an integrated framework and case analysis”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2, pp. 14‐23. · DOI
  2. Al‐Mashari, M. and Zairi, M. (2000), “The effective application of SAP R/3: a proposed model of best practice”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 156‐66. · DOI
  3. Alshawi, S. (2001), “Logistics in the internet age: towards a holistic information and processes picture”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 235‐42. · DOI
  4. Angeles, R. (2000), “Revisiting the role of internet‐EDI in the current electronic commerce scene”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 45‐57. · DOI
  5. Avison, D., Dwivedi, Y.K., Fitzgerald, G. and Powell, P. (2008), “The beginnings of a new era: time to reflect on 17 years of the ISJ”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 5‐21. · DOI
  6. Ballantine, J.A. and Stray, S. (1999), “Information systems and other capital investments: evaluation practices compared”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 78‐93. · DOI
  7. Baskerville, R. and Siponen, M. (2002), “An information security meta‐policy for emergent organizations”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 337‐46. · DOI
  8. Beamon, B. (1999), “Designing the green supply chain”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 332‐42. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bhatt, G.D. and Emdad, A.F. (2001), “An analysis of the virtual value chain in electronic commerce”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2, pp. 78‐85. · DOI
  10. Burn, J. and Robins, G. (2003), “Moving towards e‐government: a case study of organisational change processes”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 25‐35. · DOI
  11. Cebi, F. and Bayraktar, D. (2003), “An integrated approach for supplier selection”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 395‐400. · DOI
  12. Chapman, P., James‐Moore, M., Szczygiel, M. and Thompson, D. (2000), “Building internet capabilities in SMEs”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 353‐61. · DOI
  13. Chen, W.S. and Hirschheim, R. (2004), “A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 197‐235. · DOI
  14. Childerhouse, P. and Towill, D. (2000), “Engineering supply chains to match customer requirements”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 337‐46. · DOI
  15. Claver, E., Gonzalez, R. and Llopis, J. (2000), “An analysis of research in information systems (1981‐1997)”, Information & Management, Vol. 37, pp. 181‐95. · DOI
  16. Cronk, M.C. and Fitzgerald, E.P. (1999), “Understanding ‘Is business value‘: derivation of dimensions”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 40‐9. · DOI
  17. Davenport, T.H. and Brooks, J.D. (2004), “Enterprise systems and the supply chain”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 8‐19. · DOI
  18. Dwivedi, Y.K. (2009), “An analysis of e‐government research published in transforming government: people, process and policy (TGPPP)”, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 7‐15. · DOI
  19. Dwivedi, Y.K. and Kuljis, J. (2008), “Profile of IS research published in the European Journal of Information Systems”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 678‐93. · DOI
  20. Dwivedi, Y.K., Kiang, M., Lal, B. and Williams, M.D. (2008), “Profiling research published in the Journal of Electronic Commerce Research”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 77‐91.
  21. Dwivedi, Y.K., Lal, B., Mustafee, N. and Williams, M.D. (2009), “Profiling a decade of Information Systems Frontiers' research”, Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 87‐102. · DOI
  22. Irani, Z., Hlupic, V., Baldwin, L.P. and Love, P.E.D. (2000), “Re‐engineering manufacturing processes through simulation modelling”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 7‐13. · DOI
  23. Jharkharia, S. and Shankar, R. (2005), “IT‐enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 11‐27. · DOI
  24. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. and Ulukan, Z. (2003), “Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 382‐94. · DOI
  25. Mason, C., Castleman, T. and Parker, C. (2008), “Communities of enterprise: developing regional SMEs in the knowledge economy”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 571‐84. · DOI
  26. Mondragon, A.E.C., Lyons, A.C., Michaelides, Z. and Kehoe, D.F. (2006), “Automotive supply chain models and technologies: a review of some latest developments”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 551‐62. · DOI
  27. Palvia, P., Pinjani, P. and Sibley, E.H. (2007), “A profile of information systems research published in the Information & Management”, Information & Management, Vol. 44, pp. 1‐11. · DOI
  28. Parker, C.M. and Castleman, T. (2009), “Small firm e‐business adoption: a critical analysis of theory”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 22 Nos 1/2, pp. 167‐82. · DOI
  29. Remenyi, D. and Sherwood‐Smith, M. (1999), “Maximise information systems value by continuous participative evaluation”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 14‐31. · DOI
  30. Serafeimidis, V. and Smithson, S. (1999), “Rethinking the approaches to information systems investment evaluation”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 94‐107. · DOI
  31. Stockdale, R. and Standing, C. (2004), “Benefits and barriers of electronic marketplace participation: an SME perspective”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 301‐11. · DOI
  32. Sutton, S. (2006), “Extended‐enterprise systems' impact on enterprise risk management”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 97‐114. · DOI
  33. Tetteh, E. and Burn, J. (2001), “Global strategies for SME‐business: applying the SMALL framework”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2, pp. 171‐80. · DOI
  34. van Hooft, F.P.C. and Stegwee, R.A. (2001), “E‐business strategy: how to benefit from a hype”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2, pp. 44‐54. · DOI
  35. Warkentin, M., Bapna, R. and Sugumaran, V. (2001), “E‐knowledge networks for inter‐organizational collaborative e‐business”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2, pp. 149‐63. · DOI
  36. Barki, H., Rivard, S. and Talbot, J. (1993), “A keyword classification scheme for IS research literature: an update”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 209‐25. · DOI
  37. Clarke, R. (2008), “An exploratory study of information systems researcher impact”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 22, pp. 1‐32. · DOI
  38. Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D. and Venkatesh, V. (2008), “Guest Editorial: a profile of adoption of information & communication technologies (ICT) research in the household context”, Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 385‐90. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods

    Sivarajah, U., Kamal, M. M., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001 · Cited by 2,066

    “The researchmethods employed by the BD researchers in the selected 243 papers and were coded under different categories as suggested by Dwivedi, Kiang, Lal, and Williams (2008) and Dwivedi and Mustafee (2010). The findings suggest that although a total of 11 different types of researchmethodswere recorded fromour data…”
    MethodInfluential

Metadata

Authors
Dwivedi, Y. K., & Mustafee, N.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2010-01-05
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
8-26
ISSN
1741-0398 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/17410391011008888
OpenAlex
W2093056421
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Enterprise Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
research trends, authorship patterns, co-authorship analysis, research methodology, keyword analysis, citation impact, e-commerce, supply chain management, small and medium-sized enterprises, outsourcing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review