The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the definition of lean production and the methods and goals associated with the concept as well as how it differs from other popular management concepts. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on a review of the contemporary literature on lean production, both journal articles and books. Findings: It is shown in the paper that there is no consensus on a definition of lean production between the examined authors. The authors also seem to have different opinions on which characteristics should be associated with the concept. Overall it can be concluded that lean production is not clearly defined in the reviewed literature. This divergence can cause some confusion on a theoretical level, but is probably more problematic on a practical level when organizations aim to implement the concept. This paper argues that it is important for an organization to acknowledge the different variations, and to raise the awareness of the input in the implementation process. It is further argued that the organization should not accept any random variant of lean, but make active choices and adapt the concept to suit the organization's needs. Through this process of adaptation, the organization will be able to increase the odds of performing a predictable and successful implementation. Originality/value: This paper provides a critical perspective on the discourse surrounding lean production, and gives an input to the discussion of the implementation of management models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
Parker, S. K. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.620 · Cited by 438
The effects of Lean production on worker job stress
Conti, R., Angelis, J., Cooper, C., Faragher, B., & Gill, C. (2006) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570610682616 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review
Holden, R. J. (2011) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001 · Cited by 516
Lean production: literature review and trends
Jasti, N. V. K., & Kodali, R. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.937508 · Cited by 485
The Promise of Lean in Health Care
Toussaint, J. S., & Berry, L. L. (2013) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.025 · Cited by 421
The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices
Azadegan, A., Patel, P. C., Zangoueinezhad, A., & Linderman, K. (2013) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.03.002 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettersen, J.
- Venue
- The TQM Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-02-27
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-142
- ISSN
- 0954-478X (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2004912635
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 45.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17542730910938137
- The paper
- Pettersen, J. (2009). Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. The TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730910938137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.