The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Market reactions to the first‐time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters
Abstract
Purpose: The paper attempts to determine whether market participants see value in the corporate choice to begin publishing a standalone sustainability report. It also seeks to investigate whether differences in market reactions are associated with the quality of the sustainability report. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses standard market model methods to isolate the unexpected change in market returns in the period surrounding the announcement of the release of a first‐time sustainability report. Findings: The paper finds, on average, no significant market reaction to the announcement of the release of the sustainability reports. However, in cross‐sectional analyses, it is found that companies with the highest quality reports exhibited significantly more positive market reactions than companies issuing lower quality reports. These results hold when we control for firm size and membership in socially exposed industries. Research limitations/implications: The paper examines only the US firms and the measure of quality is based on an assessment of the extent to which reports provide disclosures recommended by the Global Reporting Initiative. The sample is also relatively small. Finally, the analysis examines perceived value for only one potential stakeholder group – shareholders. Future research could address any of these shortcomings. Practical implications: The evidence suggests that companies seeking value from their sustainability reporting need to carefully consider the quality of their presentations. Originality/value: The finding that quality of sustainability reporting is important to investors provides valuable evidence to support improvements in the implementation of sustainability accounting and reporting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value
Blacconiere, W. G., & Patten, D. M. (1994) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4 · Cited by 782
Self-citation
Cited by
What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review
Dienes, D., Sassen, R., & Fischer, J. (2016) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-08-2014-0050 · Cited by 441
Barauskaite, G., & Streimikiene, D. (2021) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2048 · Cited by 435
CSR disclosure: the more things change…?
Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1549 · Cited by 413
Self-citationThe Normativity and Legitimacy of CSR Disclosure: Evidence from France
Chauvey, J.-N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2114-y · Cited by 403
Self-citationMaterial Sustainability Information and Stock Price Informativeness
Grewal, J., Hauptmann, C., & Serafeim, G. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04451-2 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M.
- Venue
- Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-07-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-50
- ISSN
- 2040-8021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1560653061
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Market reactions to the first‐time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/20408021011059214
- The paper
- Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2010). Market reactions to the first‐time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021011059214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.