Cited by 2Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and ProgramsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Assessing Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge: What Knowledge Matters and What Evidence Counts?

Hill, Heather C., Sleep, Laurie, Lewis, Jennifer M., Ball, Deborah Loewenberg·2007·Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/978-1-28141-200-320251007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The process of investigating MKT is influenced by the investigator's own knowledge and the type of practices that PMTs engage in.

    “Our findings also support Hill et al.'s (2007) and Chick (2009) argument that the process of investigating MKT is influenced by our own knowledge and the type of practices that PMTs engage in.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Published
2007-06-15
Pages
111-155
OpenAlex
W4417128460
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
teacher mathematical knowledge, teacher knowledge assessment, mathematics teacher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review