The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making
Open accessAbstract
Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically written by Per Linell discusses Interactional and contextual theories of human sense - making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Since people have a natural tendency to keep up the self as a coherent construct (Hermans and Kempen 1993; Ho et al. 2001), the unity of the self is held together through constant internal dialogue (Linell 2009).”
From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Linell 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In terms of a dialogical self, encountering a tension can be manifested in an internal dialogue between different voices or positions (Linell 2009).”
From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Linell 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Abbey, E. A., & Diriwächter, R. (Eds.). (2008). Innovating genesis: Microgenetic approaches in developmental psychology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
- Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid arts. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(1), 117-126.
- Chang, R. S. (Ed.). (in preparation). Relating to environments: A new look at umwelt. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
- Ferreira, T., Salgado, J., & Cunha, C. (2006). Ambiguity and the dialogical self: In search for a dialogical psychology. Estudios de Psicologia, 27(1), 19-32.
- Hermans, H. J. M. (1996). Opposites in a dialogical self: Constructs as characters. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 9, 1-26.
- Hermans, H. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture and Psychology, 7(3), 243-281.
- Hermans, H. J. (Ed.). (2002). Special Issue on dialogical self. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 147-280.
- Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Hermans, H. J., & Dimaggio, G. (2007). Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11(1), 31-61.
- Marková, I. (1990). A three-step process as a unit of analysis in dialogue. In I. Mark- ová & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 129-146). Hemel Hemp- stead: Harvester.
- Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representation. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
- In L. M. Simão & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question: Labyrinths of the self. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
- Salgado, J., & Gonçalves, M. (2007). The dialogical self: Social, personal, and (un) conscious. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 608-621). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Salgado, J., & Hermans, H. (2005). The return to subjectivity: From a multiplicity of selves to the dialogical self. E-Journal of Applied Psychology: Clinical section, 1(1), 1-13. http://www.swin.edu.au/lib/ir/onlinejournals/ejap/
- Toda, M., & Higuchi, K. (1994). Common sense, emotion, and chatting and their roles in interpersonal interaction. In J. Siegfried (Ed.), The status of common sense in psychology (pp. 208-244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Valsiner, J. (1985). Common sense and psychological theories: The historical nature of logical necessity. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 97-109.
Cited by
Dialogism and dialogicality in the study of the self
Grossen, M., & Salazar Orvig, A. (2011) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x11418541 · Cited by 92
Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work
Arvaja, M. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1379483 · Cited by 65
Timmis, S. (2014) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9178-z · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Linell, P.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Linell, Per
- Venue
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2009-04-24
- OpenAlex
- W4416872923
- Cited by
- 1,292
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 76.37
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Information Age Publishing eBooks
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
- Keywords
- dialogism, language and mind, sensemaking, interaction theory, contextualism, philosophy of language, pragmatics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
