Cited by 51Innovations in Medical EducationEducational Innovations and ChallengesNursing education and management

Integrating Digital Transformation in Nursing Education: Best Practices and Challenges in Curriculum Development

Tiago, Reis da Silva, Mitchell, Aby·2024·Digital Transformation in Higher Education, Part B

Abstract

Digital transformation in nursing education is crucial for enhancing pedagogical practices and preparing future healthcare professionals for the rapidly evolving healthcare landscape. This chapter explores how the integration of digital technologies in higher education has revolutionising teaching methodologies and offered new opportunities to enhance learning experiences. It identifies gaps in digital learning modalities for undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students and discusses strategies to strengthen online literacy preparation and transition into the healthcare sector's digital transformation landscape and the 4th industrial era economy. The chapter examines best practices and challenges in digital transformation in nursing education such as blended learning environments, simulation and virtual reality, mobile learning applications and gamification strategies. Additionally, it addresses challenges in curriculum development including insufficient technological infrastructure, faculty training and development, assessment strategies and resistance to change among faculty and students. This chapter aims to provide insights and recommendations for educators, curriculum developers and policymakers in implementing successful digital transformation in nursing education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/978-1-83608-424-220241004

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current nursing education system may not be adequately preparing future nurses to navigate AI-integrated environments.

    “Furthermore, the current nursing education system may not be adequately preparing future nurses to navigate the complexities of AI-integrated environments, necessitating curriculum reform and the development of AI literacy programs [11,12].”
  • The adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.

    “Despite these promising developments, the adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiago, R. D. S., & Mitchell, A.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Digital Transformation in Higher Education, Part B
Published
2024-10-28
Pages
57-101
OpenAlex
W4403435355
Cited by
51
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 17
FWCI
134.91
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
digital transformation, nursing education, curriculum development, blended learning, simulation-based training, virtual reality, mobile learning, gamification, internet literacy, faculty training, resistance to change, technological infrastructure, assessment methods, Fourth Industrial Revolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review