How meaningful activities influence the recovery process
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore two research questions: how do people with concurrent substance abuse and mental health disorders (concurrent conditions) experience and describe meaningful activities? And how do meaningful activities influence the recovery process? Design/methodology/approach: This qualitative study uses an explorative and interpretive design in a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. Transcribed interviews are analysed using a phenomenological-hermeneutic method for researching lived experience. The study was submitted to the Norwegian Center for Research Data where it was approved (Case No. 54661). Findings: Structural analysis resulted in three overarching themes: achieving a positive identity through actions and feeling worthwhile; physically outside but inside the norms of society, and idleness, isolation, and obstacles on the road to recovery. Meaningful activities, considered a cornerstone in the recovery process, vary widely and are primarily described in social contexts, thereby confirming the significance of social aspects of recovery in addition to recovery as an individual journey. The findings also show that experiencing meaningful activities contributes to recovery capital and the development of recovery-promotive identities. Research limitations/implications: The study consisted of a small sample size, recruited at one location which served as a primary research limitation. Practical implications: This paper provides insights for health care practitioners and health care decision makers regarding the importance of meaningful activities viewed through a recovery perspective. Originality/value: Few studies to date have used a comprehensive approach to describe the influence of experiencing meaningful activities on the recovery process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Time use practice approaches offer a collaborative way to map day-to-day experiences, enabling individuals to reflect on the impacts of their daily activity experiences on their health and wellbeing.
“Time use practice approaches offer a collaborative way to map day-to-day experiences, enabling individuals to reflect on the impacts of their daily activity experiences on their health and wellbeing (13, 22).”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Nordaunet, O. M., & Sælør, K. T.
- Affiliations
- University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
- Venue
- Advances in Dual Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-05-23
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 114-125
- ISSN
- 1757-0972 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803842966
- Semantic Scholar
- 2eb078119ab3a5339317a7b56a50ce0c76fa1bdd
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Dual Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- meaningful activities, recovery process, dual diagnosis, substance abuse, mental illness, recovery capital, lived experience, social norms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review