Why are experienced users of WeChat likely to continue using the app?
Abstract
Purpose: Mobile social apps permeate every facet of daily life through the pervasive use of smartphones. Customer retention with mobile social apps has become extremely important for app-related companies. The purpose of this paper is to explore why experienced users in mobile social apps (e.g. WeChat) are likely to continue using the app. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposed a conceptual model to identify key determinants of continuance intention of WeChat users and highlight the effects of individual experience. Data were collected from WeChat users, which is one of the most popular mobile social apps in China. The study employed partial least squares regression to test the research model based on a survey of 295 valid responses. Findings: Results showed that trust, which was driven by user satisfaction and perceived critical mass, played a critical role in influencing the continuance intention of WeChat users. Moreover, tie strength exerted a negative moderating effect on the relationship between trust and continuance intention. Specifically, tie strength and perceived critical mass had strong impacts on the continuance intention of low-experience users. In addition, the effect of frequency was closely associated with the continuance intention of high-experience users. Research limitations/implications: This study addressed the issue of mobile social app continuance intention by providing an innovative means to explore the key antecedents of user continuance intention from the experience perspective. The findings not only prove that trust plays a central role in influencing the continuance intention of experienced users but also reveal that the determinants of continuance intention vary among users with different experience. The results provide insights into the key antecedents of experienced WeChat user continuance intention and contribute to the literature on mobile social apps and individual differences. Practical implications: The results provide suggestions for mobile social app practitioners to effectively plan mobile social app retention practices and to set up appropriate incentive mechanisms for retaining users with different experiences. Originality/value: Although abundant studies have focused on the adoption of media users, few studies have investigated the post-adoption behavior of experienced users in the context of mobile social apps. This study revealed the key determinants of the continuance intention of WeChat users and pinpointed the different impacts of these antecedents on users with different levels of experience. It also provides useful guidelines for practitioners to effectively retain users with different levels of experience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social ties among members of WeChat play an important role in trust in the WeChat platform in general.
“Likewise, Gong et al. found that social ties among members of WeChat played an important role in trust in the WeChat platform in general [33,34].”
From What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Social ties are a significant trust antecedent, though one study disagreed.
“Three studies in our corpus suggested that social ties were a signifcant trust antecedent [34,34,109], whereas one study in our corpus disagreed [26].”
From What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Perceived critical mass is positively related to users' trust in the social media platform WeChat.
“This study found that perceived critical mass was positively related to users' trust in the social media platform, WeChat [34].”
From What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 136 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Gong, X., Liu, Z., Zheng, X., & Wu, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-10-29
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1013-1039
- ISSN
- 1355-5855 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898738567
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- WeChat, continuance intention, user retention, user experience, trust, user satisfaction, perceived critical mass, tie strength, individual differences, post-adoption behavior, usage frequency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review