Behavioral approach to food waste: an experiment
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of behavioral interventions and nudging in dealing with the food waste problem. In particular, the authors implement an information campaign aiming to increase consumers’ awareness of the food waste problem. Design/methodology/approach In the period of three weeks, the authors observe intentions to prevent food waste and actual food waste of the consumers in a university restaurant serving ready meals. During the intervention period, consumers are exposed to an information campaign, designed to avoid consumers’ insufficient planning problem. Findings Consumers are willing to pay the same price for less food more often during the campaign than before the campaign, but the approximated impact on the food waste is not significant. Social emotions of guilt and shame are linked to consumers’ intentions to prevent food waste, suggesting channels to be included in a successful information campaign nudging consumers toward food waste reduction. Research limitations/implications The authors were not able to measure precisely food waste, but observed consumers in a real-life context. Consumers were not aware of the study, and made daily purchase decisions before and after the information campaign. Social implications Consumer behavior is at the core of the food waste problem in developed countries. It is important to understand how consumers can be nudged at low cost, using an information campaign, to change their attitude to food waste, and to decrease food waste. Originality/value The authors collected an original dataset on the impact of an information campaign, observing behavior of consumers in a real-life context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Portion advertising information resulted in greater uptake of smaller portions (up to 6% from 3.5%) (Jagau and Vyrastekova, 2017).
“while portion advertising information also resulted in greater uptake of smaller portions (up to 6% from 3.5%) (Jagau and Vyrastekova, 2017).”
From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Jagau and Vyrastekova, 2017
Encouraging guests at restaurants and in large-scale households to adjust the portions to how hungry they are, or to take smaller portions at a buffet and come back if you want more, are examples of low hanging fruits.
“One example of the former kind is to encourage guests at restaurants and in large-scale households to adjust the portions to how hungry they are (Jagau and Vyrastekova, 2017), or to take smaller portions at a buffet and come back if you want more (Kallbekken and Sælen, 2013).”
From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Jagau and Vyrastekova, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Jagau, H. L., & Vyrastekova, J.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- ORCID
- Vyrastekova, Jana
- Venue
- British Food Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-04-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 882-894
- ISSN
- 0007-070X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2599089709
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- food waste, nudging, behavioral interventions, information campaigns, consumer awareness, food waste prevention, guilt and shame, consumer behavior, university restaurant, ready-to-eat meals, food planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review