Cited by 25Technology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Exploring the meteoric rise of online food ordering apps (OFOAs): the moderating role of visibility

Chakraborty, Debarun·2022·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose: Online food ordering apps (OFOAs) have become increasingly popular, and consumers have widely recognized their benefits, particularly during pandemics or lockdowns. Despite the growing popularity of OFOAs, little is known about technology acceptance theories and their impact on purchase intention. The current study proposes the amalgamation of three theories to bridge this gap, better explaining customer behaviour toward OFOAs. Design/methodology/approach: To create a model, the researcher applied technology acceptance theories, visibility and purchase intention. To obtain results, the researcher used structural equation modelling (SEM) and moderation analysis on 432 responses obtained through a questionnaire. Findings: According to the research, all constructs were found to have a favourable and significant impact on the intention to use OFOAs, except compatibility. The moderating effect of visibility on intent to purchase is shown in the study. The study's findings add to the knowledge of consumer behaviour and practice. Research limitations/implications: This work sheds light on technology acceptance theories that ensure that OFOA platforms are used indefinitely. Furthermore, the significance of visibility as a mediator of purchase intention provides a deep insight into customer behaviour. Originality/value: This model, which combines technology acceptance theories' original constructs with visibility to moderate purchase intention on OFOA platforms, is the first of its type in the current literature. Furthermore, this theoretical progress paves the way for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bfj-08-2021-0906

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chakraborty, D.
Affiliations
Symbiosis International University (IN)
Corresponding author
Chakraborty, Debarun
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-12-20
Volume
124
Issue
11
Pages
3871-3887
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200575618
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
technology acceptance, purchase intention, moderating effect, consumer behavior, compatibility, pandemic lockdown, food delivery apps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review