Cited by 20Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer behavior in food and healthBehavioral Health and Interventions

Processed food choice based on the theory of planned behavior in the context of nutritional warning labels

Open access
Aliaga-Ortega, Luis, Adasme-Berríos, Cristian, Méndez, Caren, Soto, Carolina, Schnettler, Berta·2019·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of nutritional warning (NW) labels on the behavior of consumers of processed foods, considering demographic and psychological factors associated with the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Design/methodology/approach: The study had a descriptive and cross-sectional design. A survey was applied to 200 household food decision makers from central Chile. This questionnaire was developed based on the planned behavior theory that evaluates the psychological constructs of human behavior: Attitude (ATT), Subjective Norms (SN), Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) and Purchase Intention (PI) toward processed foods with NW. Sociodemographic variables were also included. The data were analyzed by using a multinomial logit (MNL) model, where three types of categories are established depending on the choice made by the consumer. Thus, the dependent variable responds to the effect of the following probabilities: Eliminate from Consumption, Do Not Eliminate from Consumption and Do Not Know whether or not to eliminate from consumption when selecting a food processed with NW. Findings: The results show that the implementation of NW has significant effects on the choice of processed foods purchases made by Chilean consumers. Consumers with negative ATT and PBC in the presence of NW on processed foods eliminated this type of food from their consumption. On the other hand, those who did not eliminate processed foods with NW from their consumption made that choice because they had a positive PBC. In addition, consumers who were unsure about eliminating or consuming processed foods with NW also had a positive PBC. In addition, SN and sociodemographic variables did not affect consumer choice. Practical implications: The results of this study are crucial in informing public policy strategies seeking to alert consumers about the content of processed foods, thus raising awareness for decision making in order to reduce noncommunicable diseases associated with poor eating habits. Originality/value: The study provides evidence on the effect of NWs for processed foods on consumer decisions based on the TPB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bfj-10-2018-0695

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 20

Authors
Aliaga-Ortega, L., Adasme-Berríos, C., Méndez, C., Soto, C., & Schnettler, B.
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of the Maule (CL)
  • Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-10-21
Volume
121
Issue
12
Pages
3266-3280
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981897785
Cited by
20
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Omeka S (Universidad de La Frontera) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
processed foods, theory of planned behavior, consumer food choice, purchase intention, perceived behavioral control, attitudes, subjective norms, food labeling, non-communicable diseases, Chilean consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review