Cited by 48Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

How do idiosyncratic deals contribute to the employability of older workers?

Open access
Oostrom, Janneke K., Pennings, Martine, Bal, P. Matthijs·2016·Career Development International

Abstract

Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationships of i-deals with the employability of older workers, and introduce two distinct theoretical processes through which these effects occur. On the one hand, a self-enhancement perspective postulates that i-deals enhance self-efficacy through which older workers become more employable. On the other hand, a lifespan perspective postulates that i-deals enhance older workers’ future time perspective through which they become more employable. Design/methodology/approach: – Data were gathered among 244 employees via an online questionnaire that had been sent to employees of 45 years or older at eight companies in the Netherlands. Findings: – Results showed that task and work responsibilities i-deals are strongly related to older workers’ employability, and that this relationship is mediated by future time perspective and self-efficacy. Location flexibility i-deals were positively related to employability. Financial i-deals and schedule flexibility i-deals were unrelated to employability. Research limitations/implications: – This study introduces two novel ways through which i-deals for older workers can be studied: a self-enhancement and a future time perspective. Both can explain how older workers may enhance their employability by negotiating i-deals. Practical implications: – As the percentage of older workers will increase, there is a great need for organizations to focus on the employability of older workers. The present study shows that organizations are able to increase the employability of older workers by individual arrangements. Originality/value: – Individualization of work arrangements has been theorized to facilitate older workers’ employability, but the present study is the first to investigate how i-deals may contribute to greater employability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/cdi-08-2015-0112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 48

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Anand, S. , Vidyarthi, P.R. , Liden, R.C. and Rousseau, D.M. (2010), “Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 970-988. · DOI
  2. Bal, P.M. and Jansen, P.G. (2015), “Idiosyncratic deals for older workers: Increased heterogeneity among older workers enhance the need for i-deal”, in Bal, P.M. , Kooij, D.T.A.M. and Rousseau, D.M. (Eds), Aging Workers and the Employee-Employer Relationship , Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 129-144. · DOI
  3. Bal, P.M. and Kooij, D.T.A.M. (2011), “The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: the influence of age”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 497-523. · DOI
  4. Bal, P.M. and Lub, X.D. (2015), “Individualization of work arrangements: a contextualized perspective on the rise and use of i-deals”, in Bal, P.M. and Rousseau, D.M. (Eds), Idiosyncratic Deals between Employees and Organizations: Conceptual Issues, Applications, and the Role of Coworkers , Psychology Press, New York, NY, pp. 9-23. · DOI
  5. Bal, P.M. and Rousseau, D.M. (2015), Idiosyncratic Deals between Employees and Organizations: Conceptual Issues, Applications, and the Role of Coworkers , Psychology Press, New York, NY. · DOI
  6. Bal, P.M. , Kooij, D.T.A.M. and De Jong, S.B. (2013), “How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 545-572. · DOI
  7. Bal, P.M. , Van Kleef, M. and Jansen, P.G.W. (2015), “The impact of career customization on work outcomes: boundary conditions of manager support and employee age”, Journal of Organizational Behavior , Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 421-440. · DOI
  8. Bal, P.M. , De Jong, S.B. , Jansen, P.G.W. and Bakker, A.B. (2012), “Motivating employees to work beyond retirement: a multi-level study of the role of i-deals and unit climate”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 306-331. · DOI
  9. Bal, P.M. , Jansen, P.G.W. , Van der Velde, M.E.G. , De Lange, A.H. and Rousseau, D.M. (2010), “The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: a study among older workers”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 474-486. · DOI
  10. Benko, C. and Weisberg, A. (2007), Mass Career Customization: Aligning the Workplace with Today’s Nontraditional Workforce , Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA.
  11. Berntson, E. , Näswall, K. and Sverke, M. (2008), “Investigating the relationship between employability and self-efficacy: a cross-lagged analysis”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 413-425. · DOI
  12. Cate, R.A. and John, O.P. (2007), “Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age”, Psychology and Aging , Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 186-201. · DOI
  13. Chen, G. , Gully, S.M. and Eden, D. (2001), “Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale”, Organizational Research Methods , Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 62-83. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Colella, A. , Paetzold, R.L. , Zardkoohi, A. and Wesson, M.J. (2007), “Exposing pay secrecy”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 55-71. · DOI
  15. De Graaf, S. , Peeters, M. and Van der Heijden, B. (2011), “De relatie tussen employability en de intentie tot langer doorwerken”, Gedrag en Organisatie , Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 375-392. · DOI
  16. Forrier, A. , Verbruggen, M. and De Cuyper, N. (2015), “Integrating different notions of employability in a dynamic chain: the relationship between job transitions, movement capital, and perceived employability”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol. 89 No. 2015, pp. 56-64, available at: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879115000421
  17. Freese, C. , Nauta, A. and Van der Heijden, B. (2012), “I-deals en employability”, Tijdschrift voor HRM , Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 4-13.
  18. Fugate, M. , Kinicki, A.J. and Ashforth, B.E. (2004), “Employability: a psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 14-38. · DOI
  19. Fung, H.H. , Lai, P. and Ng, R. (2001), “Age differences in social preferences among Taiwanese and Mainland Chinese: the role of perceived time”, Psychology and Aging , Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 351-356. · DOI
  20. Gouldner, A.W. (1960), “The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement”, American Sociological Review , Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 161-178. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Guerrero, S. , Bentein, K. and Lapalme, M.È. (2014), “Idiosyncratic deals and high performers’ organizational commitment”, Journal of Business and Psychology , Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 323-334. · DOI
  22. Hornung, S. , Rousseau, D.M. , Glaser, J. , Angerer, P. and Weigl, M. (2010), “Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals”, Journal of Organizational Behavior , Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 187-215. · DOI
  23. Husman, J. and Shell, D.F. (2008), “Beliefs and perceptions about the future: a measurement of future time perspective”, Learning and Individual Differences , Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 166-175. · DOI
  24. Kelliher, C. and Anderson, D. (2010), “Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work”, Human Relations , Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 83-106. · DOI
  25. Koen, J. , Klehe, U.C. and Van Vianen, A.E. (2013), “Employability among the long-term unemployed: a futile quest or worth the effort?”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 37-48. · DOI
  26. Kooij, D.T.A.M. , Guest, D.E. , Clinton, M. , Knight, T. , Jansen, P.G. and Dikkers, J.S. (2013), “How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 18-35. · DOI
  27. Lang, F.R. and Carstensen, L.L. (2002), “Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships”, Psychology and Aging , Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 125-139. · DOI
  28. Lee, J.Y. , Bachrach, D.G. and Rousseau, D.M. (2015), “Internal labor markets, firm-specific human capital, and heterogeneity antecedents of employee idiosyncratic deal requests”, Organization Science , Vol. 26, pp. 794-810. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0955. · DOI
  29. Liao, C. , Wayne, S.J. and Rousseau, D.M. (2014), “Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: a qualitative and meta-analytical review”, Journal of Organizational Behavior , Vol. 37, pp. S9-S29. doi: 10.1002/job.1959. · DOI
  30. Liu, J. , Lee, C. , Hui, C. , Kwan, H.K. and Wu, L.Z. (2013), “Idiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: the mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 98 No. 5, pp. 832-840. · DOI
  31. Macho, S. and Ledermann, T. (2011), “Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: the phantom model approach”, Psychological Methods , Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 34-43. · DOI
  32. May, D. , Reed, K. , Schwoerer, C. and Potter, P. (2004), “Ergonomic office design and aging: a quasi-experimental field study of employee reactions to an ergonomics intervention program”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 123-135. · DOI
  33. Nelson, E.A. and Dannefer, D. (1992), “Aged heterogeneity: fact or fiction? The fate of diversity in gerontological research”, The Gerontologist , Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 17-23. · DOI
  34. Ng, T.W. and Feldman, D.C. (2008), “Can you get a better deal elsewhere? The effects of psychological contract replicability on organizational commitment over time”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 268-277. · DOI
  35. Ng, T.W. and Feldman, D.C. (2015), “Idiosyncratic deals and voice behavior”, Journal of Management , Vol. 41, pp. 893-928. doi: 10.1177/0149206312457824. · DOI
  36. Pitt-Catsouphes, M. and Matz-Costa, C. (2008), “The multi-generational workforce: workplace flexibility and engagement”, Community, Work and Family , Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 215-229. · DOI
  37. Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008), “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models”, Behavior Research Methods , Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 879-891. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Rosen, C.C. , Slater, D.J. , Chang, D. and Johnson, R.E. (2013), “Let’s make a deal: development and validation of the ex post i-deals scale”, Journal of Management , Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 1-33. · DOI
  39. Rousseau, D.M. (2001), “Schema, promise and mutuality: the building blocks of the psychological contract”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 511-541. · DOI
  40. Rousseau, D.M. , Hornung, S. and Kim, T.G. (2009), “Idiosyncratic deals: testing propositions on timing, content, and the employment relationship”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol. 74 No. 3, pp. 338-348. · DOI
  41. Van der Heijde, C.M. and Van der Heijden, B.I.J.M. (2006), “A competence-based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 449-476. · DOI
  42. Van der Meij, K. and Bal, P.M. (2013), “De ideale ‘idiosyncratic-deal’”, Gedrag en Organisatie , Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 156-181. · DOI
  43. Wang, M. and Shultz, K.S. (2010), “Employee retirement: a review and recommendations for future investigation”, Journal of Management , Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 172-206. · DOI
  44. Wright, J. (2006), “Crisis and opportunity: coaching older workers in the workplace”, Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation , Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 93-96. · DOI
  45. Zacher, H. and Frese, M. (2009), “Remaining time and opportunities at work: relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective”, Psychology and Aging , Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 487-493. · DOI
  46. Caspi, A. and Roberts, B.W. (2001), “Personality development across the life course: the argument for change and continuity”, Psychological Inquiry , Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 49-66. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Oostrom, J. K., Pennings, M., & Bal, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Venue
Career Development International
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-05-09
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
176-192
ISSN
1362-0436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2300150437
Cited by
48
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Career Development International (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
older workers, employability, self-efficacy, future time perspective, self-enhancement, lifespan perspective, temporal flexibility, financial arrangements, schedule flexibility, individualization of work, aging workforce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review