Does Agricultural Commodity Speculation Contribute to Sustainable Development?
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to conceptually analyse the role of speculation in society to determine whether agricultural commodity index funds, a new form of speculation, contribute to sustainable development. Design/methodology/approach – The theoretical arguments justifying the value of the market economic system for generating sustainable development and the positive contribution speculators make too in this context are elaborated. It is then considered whether the arguments justifying traditional speculation hold for agricultural commodity index funds. Findings – Traditional forms of speculation contribute positively to sustainable development; primarily due to the information they uncover on demand and supply factors which affect prices. Agricultural index funds are a danger to sustainable development, as their transactions are not based on demand and supply factors but simply represent demand for the diversification effect which commodities generate when added to an investment portfolio. Originality/value – The article offers a new approach to assessing whether agricultural index funds contribute to sustainable development. Empirical research has been conducted on whether speculation via index funds has unjustifiably affected commodity prices. However, results of these investigations have been inconclusive due to stark limitations in data availability. By approaching the issue from a conceptual point of view, the article delivers theoretically sound arguments as to why agricultural commodity index funds are likely to have an unjustifiable effect on prices and, hence, are a danger to sustainable development. This has strong implications for finance practice and regulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The liquidity provided by index funds can contribute to volatility.
“In addition to speculation, the liquidity provided by index funds can also contribute to volatility.”
From Food Financialization: Impact of Derivatives and Index Funds on Agri-Food Market Volatility (2024) · cites this paper as Kleinau and Lin-Hi (2014)
The empirical evidence on the impact of speculation via index funds on commodity prices is inconclusive or mixed.
“Kleinau and Lin-Hi (2014) discuss the inconclusive nature of empirical research on the impact of speculation via index funds on commodity prices”
From Food Financialization: Impact of Derivatives and Index Funds on Agri-Food Market Volatility (2024) · cites this paper as Kleinau and Lin-Hi (2014)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Kleinau, C., & Lin-Hi, N.
- Affiliations
- HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management (DE)
- Venue
- Corporate Governance
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2014-09-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 685-698
- ISSN
- 1472-0701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025888900
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Corporate Governance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Keywords
- sustainable development, commodity prices, price volatility, diversification, investment portfolio, financial regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review