Cited by 15AI in Service InteractionsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

How Technology Readiness Influences Behavioral and Purchasing Intention: Serial Multiple Mediating Role of Attitude toward AI and AI-Driven Consumer Chatbot Experience

Open access
Becan, Cihan, Çeber, Burak·2026·Digital Transformation and Society

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

With the rise of AI in digital consumer experiences, one of the key challenges for businesses is predicting and influencing consumers’ behavioral and purchase intentions in AI-driven interactions. In this regard, there appears to be a knowledge gap in the literature that cannot be determined regarding the effect of technology readiness on behavioral and purchasing intentions and, accordingly, the mediating role of attitude toward AI technology and the AI-driven consumer chatbot experience. Therefore, this research aims to determine the relationships among technology readiness, attitude toward AI technology, AI-driven consumer chatbot experience, behavioral intentions, and purchase intentions. The primary focus of the study is to evaluate the impact of Turkish consumers' technology readiness on behavioral and purchase intentions through the serial multiple mediating roles of attitude toward AI technology and the AI-driven customer chatbot experience. A questionnaire designed in line with the purpose of the research was applied to 423 respondents using AI-driven chatbots during the digital shopping experience. Although technology readiness does not directly affect behavioral and purchase intentions, attitude toward AI technology and the AI-driven consumer chatbot experience play a serial multiple mediating role in the relationship between motivations for technology readiness and purchase intention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/dts-04-2025-0082

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 95 · Cited by 15

Authors
Becan, C., & Çeber, B.
Affiliations
Üsküdar University (TR)
Venue
Digital Transformation and Society
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2025-09-15
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
78-104
ISSN
  • 2755-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 2755-077X
OpenAlex
W4414261497
Cited by
15
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 2
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Transformation and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
technology readiness, attitudes toward AI, purchase intention, behavioral intention, online shopping, serial mediation, consumer acceptance of AI, Turkish consumers, emerging markets, customer service chatbots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review