The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE
Abstract
Learning is now widely accepted as the currency of survival in an era of constant change. Many businesses, however, are struggling to learn how to learn. The cultural and structural issues they need to confront in order to acquire the flexibility and responsiveness to learn were articulated in 1990 in The Fifth Discipline by Peter M Senge of Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Measuring Business Excellence revisits this now landmark work to review its continuing relevance to the aspirant learning organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture
Lezoche, M., Hernandez, J. E., Alemany Díaz, M. D. M. E., Panetto, H., & Kacprzyk, J. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103187 · Cited by 835
Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20040 · Cited by 463
Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20023 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Senge, P. M.
- Venue
- Measuring Business Excellence
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 46-51
- ISSN
- 1368-3047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982676860
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/eb025496
- The paper
- Senge, P. M. (1997). THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE. Measuring Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
