The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ON USER STUDIES AND INFORMATION NEEDS
Abstract
Abstract Apart from information retrieval there is virtually no other area of information science that has occasioned as much research effort and writing as 'user studies'. Within user studies the investigation of 'information needs' has been the subject of much debate and no little confusion. The aim of this paper is to attempt to reduce this confusion by devoting attention to the definition of some concepts and by proposing the basis for a theory of the motivations for information‐seeking behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Cited by
Models in information behaviour research
Wilson, T. D. (1999) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eum0000000007145 · Cited by 2,090
Self-citationLooking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in Information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,540
D. Wilson, T. (2000) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/576 · Cited by 1,447
Information behaviour: An interdisciplinary perspective
Wilson, T. D. (1997) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(97)00028-9 · Cited by 1,114
Self-citationSavolainen, R. (2007) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/517840 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- WILSON, T. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Documentation
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1981-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-15
- ISSN
- 0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153505326
- Cited by
- 1,565
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 78.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
