The landscape of research data management services in Malaysian academic libraries: librarians' practices and roles
Abstract
Purpose: The debate about academic librarians’ roles in research data management (RDM) services is currently relevant, especially in the context of making research data findable, accessible, interoperable and reproducible. This study aims to explore the RDM services offered by Malaysian academic libraries and the implementation progress based on the librarians’ practices and roles. Design/methodology/approach: This descriptive study involves three sequential forms of data collection: a website analysis of 20 academic libraries relating to RDM services, training and policy; an online survey of the academic libraries’ RDM implementation progress; and semi-structured interviews with three academic librarians to gauge their practices and roles in RDM services. Findings: Malaysian academic libraries provide RDM services based on their related or basic skills which are bibliographic management tools, institutional repository and openness of research data rather than impacted services to support RDM, such as data analysis, data citation, data mining or data visualisation services. Although the librarians were aware of RDM and their roles in research data services, the progress of practicing and implementation of the RDM services still has not been fully delivered to support the main RDM elements. Practical implications: This study illustrates the RDM roadmap on the current landscape of areas and types of services that the libraries are doing well. The list of services can be used and implemented as the best practices or strategies to be applied within Malaysian academic libraries. Originality/value: This study highlights the gaps of RDM services in Malaysian academic libraries. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, as this is the first study in Malaysia that articulates the case of RDM services in academic libraries, it has paved the way for further research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This finding extends earlier studies by demonstrating the extent of institutional reliance on librarians as authoritative stewards of research performance data.
“This finding extends earlier studies (Ahmed & Othman, 2021;Amanullah & Abrizah, 2023) by demonstrating the extent of institutional reliance on librarians as authoritative stewards of research performance data.”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Amanullah & Abrizah, 2023
This aligns with prior studies highlighting librarians' involvement in institutional reporting and data services.
“This aligns with prior studies highlighting librarians' involvement in institutional reporting and data services (Ahmed & Othman, 2021;Amanullah & Abrizah, 2023;Cox, 2018).”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Amanullah & Abrizah, 2023
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Maturing research data services and the transformation of academic libraries
Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., Pinfield, S., & Sbaffi, L. (2019) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-12-2018-0211 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Research data management policy and practice in Chinese university libraries
Huang, Y., Cox, A. M., & Sbaffi, L. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24413 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ayoib, A., Ismail, M. A., & Abdullah, N. (2026) · Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science · doi:10.22452/mjlis.vol31no1.2
“This aligns with prior studies highlighting librarians’ involvement in institutional reporting and data services (Ahmed & Othman, 2021; Amanullah & Abrizah, 2023; Cox, 2018).”
- Authors
- Amanullah, S. W., & Abrizah, A.
- Affiliations
- National University of Malaysia (MY)
- University of Malaya (MY)
- Venue
- The Electronic Library
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2023-01-18
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-86
- ISSN
- 0264-0473 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4317937837
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Electronic Library (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Optics and Image Analysis
- Keywords
- research data management, academic libraries, librarian roles, RDM services, institutional repositories, data management training, RDM policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review