The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory
Abstract
Reassembling the Social is a fundamental challenge from one of the world's leading social theorists to how we understand society and the 'social'. Bruno Latour's contention is that the word 'social' as used by Social Scientists has become laden with assumptions to the point where it has become a misnomer. When the adjective is applied to a phenomenon, it is used to indicate a stabilized state of affairs, a bundle of ties that in due course may be used to account for another phenomenon. Latour also finds the word used as if it described a type of material, in a comparable way to an adjective such as 'wooden' or 'steely'. Rather than simply indicating what is already assembled together, it is now used in a way that makes assumptions about the nature of what is assembled. It has become a word that designates two distinct things: a process of assembling: and a type of material, distinct from others. Latour shows why 'the social' cannot be thought of as a kind of material or domain, and disputes attempts to provide a 'social explanation' of other states of affairs. While these attempts have been productive (and probably necessary) in the past, the very success of the social sciences mean that they are largely no longer so. At the present stage it is no longer possible to inspect the precise constituents entering the social domain. Latour returns to the original meaning of 'the social' to redefine the notion and allow it to trace connections again. It will then be possible to resume the traditional goal of the social sciences, but using more refined tools. Drawing on his extensive work examining the 'assemblages' of nature, Latour finds it necessary to scrutinize thoroughly the exact content of what is assembled under the umbrella of Society. This approach, a 'sociology of associations' has become known as Actor-Network-Theory, and this book is an essential introduction both for those seeking to understand Actor-Network-Theory, or the ideas of one of its most influential proponents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
HOLMES, S. M., & CASTAÑEDA, H. (2016) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/amet.12259 · Cited by 471
Radical alterity is just another way of saying “reality”: A reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro
Graeber, D. (2015) · HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.14318/hau5.2.003 · Cited by 445
Comparative Case Studies: An Innovative Approach
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017) · Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE) · doi:10.7577/njcie.1929 · Cited by 346
Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13337 · Cited by 346
Iran: Downside to the "Twitter Revolution"
Morozov, E. (2009) · Dissent · doi:10.1353/dss.0.0092 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Venue
- Equal Opportunities International
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-03-28
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-309
- ISSN
- 0261-0159 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1508600805
- Cited by
- 2,789
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 157.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/eoi.2008.27.3.307.2
- The paper
- Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory. (2008). Equal Opportunities International. https://doi.org/10.1108/eoi.2008.27.3.307.2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.