“We’re changing the system with this one”: Black students using critical race algorithmic literacies to subvert and survive AI-mediated racism in school
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to center the experiences of three cohorts (n = 40) of Black high school students who participated in a critical race technology course that exposed anti-blackness as the organizing logic and default setting of digital and artificially intelligent technology. This paper centers the voices, experiences and technological innovations of the students, and in doing so, introduces a new type of digital literacy: critical race algorithmic literacy. Design/methodology/approach Data for this study include student interviews (called “talk backs”), journal reflections and final technology presentations. Findings Broadly, the data suggests that critical race algorithmic literacies prepare Black students to critically read the algorithmic word (e.g. data, code, machine learning models, etc.) so that they can not only resist and survive, but also rebuild and reimagine the algorithmic world. Originality/value While critical race media literacy draws upon critical race theory in education – a theorization of race, and a critique of white supremacy and multiculturalism in schools – critical race algorithmic literacy is rooted in critical race technology theory, which is a theorization of blackness as a technology and a critique of algorithmic anti-blackness as the organizing logic of schools and AI systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Black teens have leveraged critical race algorithmic literacies to subvert AI-mediated racism in schools.
“As an example, Black teens have leveraged critical race algorithmic literacies to subvert AI-mediated racism in schools.174”
From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [174]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Tanksley, T. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tanksley, Tiera Chante
- Venue
- English Teaching: Practice & Critique
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2024-04-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-56
- ISSN
- 1175-8708 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4393332028
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- English Teaching Practice & Critique (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Keywords
- Black students, high school students, artificial intelligence in schools, anti-Blackness, digital literacy, student agency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review