The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer satisfaction and its measurement in hospitality enterprises: a revisit and update
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to review and discuss customer satisfaction and its application to the hospitality and tourism industries. This paper defines the concept and analyzes its importance to services in general and to hospitality/tourism services in particular. This paper is a revision and update of an article previously published by Pizam and Ellis (1999) on customer satisfaction measurements. Design/methodology/approach: The most recent research on customer satisfaction measurements and scales is summarized and presented in the paper. Findings: Following a discussion on the dimensions and attributes of satisfaction, the main methods of measuring satisfaction are listed, and cross-cultural issues that affect satisfaction are reviewed. Finally, the paper concludes with a comprehensive review of the current online tools and techniques available for measuring customer satisfaction. Research limitations/implications: This summary gives a good overview to researchers who require a comprehensive review of the available research measurements and scales for customer satisfaction. Originality/value: For the past decade, a considerable amount of research has been conducted in customer satisfaction. Finding the appropriate measurements and scales for customer satisfaction can be time-consuming and confusing. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the best-known measurements and scales in customer satisfaction research. The paper also provides innovative online tools and techniques available for research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G.-Q., & Ding, W. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.109 · Cited by 2,410
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300202 · Cited by 2,084
Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence
Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070301291002 · Cited by 2,002
A Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies
Oliva, T. A., Oliver, R. L., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252298 · Cited by 812
Ganguli, S., & Roy, S. K. (2011) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321111107648 · Cited by 357
Cited by
Silence is not Golden: Motivating Employee Voice through Inclusive Leadership
Jolly, P. M., & Lee, L. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/1096348020963699 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Pizam, A., Shapoval, V., & Ellis, T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-01-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-35
- ISSN
- 0959-6119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2181577639
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 50.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.