The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adapting and validating the workplace weight-based teasing scale and its relationship with workplace aggression and psychological distress
Abstract
Purpose: The Western literature presents scales that measure weight-based teasing; however, their applicability is limited to adolescents and patients. There are limited studies that have explored this teasing in organizational settings, specifically in as culturally diverse and sensitive work environments as those in India. Given the rising cases of weight-based teasing toward both obese and skinny people, a dedicated measurement tool that is applicable in organizational settings is required. Hence, this study aims to develop the Workplace Weight-Based Teasing Scale (W-WBTS), investigate its psychometric properties in the Indian context, and examine its relationship with aggression, psychological distress, and subjective well-being. Design/methodology/approach: Data was collected from the employees working at multi-national companies in the Delhi NCR region. This study adopted a systematic scale development methodology involving a literature review and focused group discussions to generate scale items. The study then conducted two independent studies to explore the psychometric properties of the W-WBTS in India. The factorial structure in Study 1 was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (using SPSS) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (using AMOS). Study 2 evaluated the reliability and validity of the scale. Finally, gender-based invariances were tested using the measurement invariance test. Findings: EFA and CFA validated a single-factor five-item scale in Study 1. The second study’s results established the criterion validity of this scale. Furthermore, the results suggest that weight-based teasing is one of the statistically significant predictors of psychological distress in organizations, thus recommending and affirming its predictive validity. The study confirmed the scale’s incremental validity by explaining variance in psychological distress over aggression and control variables, suggesting its added predictive value over existing scales. Finally, the results confirmed the measurement invariance test of W-WBTS in Indian context. Originality/value: Existing scales predominantly focus on adolescents and patients, emphasizing only on obese populations. This study is first of its kind that fills a critical gap by adapting and validating a scale tailored for working professionals, encompassing both skinny and obese people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · Cited by 15,744
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 · Cited by 5,925
Screening for serious mental illness in the general population
Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., Howes, M. J., Normand, S.-L. T., Manderscheid, R. W., Walters, E. E., et al. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184 · Cited by 5,692
The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1512 · Cited by 4,214
My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures
Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164404266386 · Cited by 1,606
Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2 · Cited by 1,596
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cooper, 1987, The development and validation of the body shape questionnaire, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 485, 10.1002/1098-108X(198707)6:4<485::AID-EAT2260060405>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- Garner, 1991, Eating Disorder Inventory2: Professional Manual
- Melick, S. (2020), “Development and validation of a measure of algorithm aversion”, Master’s thesis, Bowling Green State University.
Metadata
- Authors
- Bansal, S., Kumar, D., & Garg, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Conflict Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2026-01-23
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 578-604
- ISSN
- 1044-4068
- 1758-8545
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 68
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adapting and validating the workplace weight-based teasing scale and its relationship with workplace aggression and psychological distress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijcma-06-2025-0186
- The paper
- Bansal, S., Kumar, D., & Garg, N. (2026). Adapting and validating the workplace weight-based teasing scale and its relationship with workplace aggression and psychological distress. International Journal of Conflict Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-06-2025-0186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.