Cited by 128Digital Marketing and Social MediaMarketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Engaging with consumers using social media: a case study of music festivals

Hudson, Simon, Hudson, Rupert·2013·International Journal of Event and Festival Management

Abstract

Purpose: – Social media has fundamentally changed the consumer decision process, and in the last decade a more nuanced view of how consumers engage with brands has emerged. Instead of the traditional purchase funnel, consumers research products and services during an extended evaluation stage, and after purchase, they often enter into an open-ended relationship with the brand, sharing their experience with it using social media. This paper describes the new consumer decision journey, and then adds to the body of research on events and festivals management by applying this new model to events and festivals. Design/methodology/approach: – The study uses a case study methodology with a multi-method approach to analyze the use of social media at three major music festivals. Case studies offer depth and comprehensiveness for understanding a specific phenomenon, enabling inductive and rich description, and are specifically welcome in new situations where little is known about the phenomenon. Findings: – In general, the music festivals profiled are proactive in their use of social media, engaging with consumers throughout the consumer decision journey. In particular, social media is making the “evaluate” and “advocate” stages of the decision journey more relevant for festival marketers. Originality/value: – This paper provides an illuminating view of the use of social media in an event and festival context. It supports the theory previously developed in this area, and is further evidence of the powerful impact that new technology can have on consumer behavior. The results have important implications for both researchers and practitioners interested in the marketing of festivals and events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijefm-06-2013-0012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extends prior works on influencer marketing settings that focus on either expertise (Uribe, Buzeta, and Velásquez 2016; Zhu and Tan 2007) or stage of CDJ (Hudson and Hudson 2013) but do not examine their interplay.

    “It extends prior works on influencer marketing settings that focus on either expertise (Uribe, Buzeta, and Velásquez 2016; Zhu and Tan 2007) or stage of the CDJ (Hudson and Hudson 2013) but do not examine their interplay.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hudson, S., & Hudson, R.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
International Journal of Event and Festival Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2013-10-11
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
206-223
ISSN
1758-2954 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083525961
Cited by
128
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
19.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Event and Festival Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
social media, music festivals, consumer decision journey, customer engagement, festival marketing, event marketing, consumer-brand relationships, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review