Cited by 8Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDisability Rights and Representation

Examining the accessibility of ChatGPT for competency-based personalised learning for specially-abled people

Patvardhan, Neha, Ranade, Madhura, Vandana, Khatwani, Ritesh·2024·The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the web accessibility issues faced by users with disabilities when using ChatGPT, a popular chatbot. It is crucial for users with disabilities to have barrier-free access to Internet communications technology to be on par with other users. Because of its roots in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, ChatGPT can empower individuals with various abilities, providing access to the Internet and potentially leading to a substantial boost in digital inclusion for these users. Design/methodology/approach The researchers focused on ensuring ease of access to ChatGPT’s webpage to achieve the study objective. They conducted manual testing with a visually impaired researcher. They used axe DevTools and Accessibility Insights to investigate the target page’s three most commonly used states for accessibility issues. Findings The researchers identified substantial and crucial web accessibility issues on the target page. These issues resulted in frustration and hindered complete access to information about ChatGPT’s features. The researchers stress the significance of prioritising web accessibility and urge web designers to integrate Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards into the initial stages of web development rather than addressing them as corrective measures. Given the United Nations' recognition of access to information and communication technology (ICT) as a pivotal Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) for users with disabilities, it is i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijilt-04-2024-0066

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Patvardhan, N., Ranade, M., Vandana, & Khatwani, R.
Affiliations
Symbiosis International University (IN)
Venue
The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2024-09-24
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
539-555
ISSN
2056-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402693700
Cited by
8
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4
FWCI
16.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Information and Learning Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
ChatGPT, web accessibility, disabled users, visually impaired users, chatbots, digital inclusion, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, accessibility testing, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review