A lesson study on a MOOC-based and AI-powered flipped teaching and assessment of EFL writing model: teachers' and students' growth
Abstract
Purpose: The lesson study aims to examine college English teachers' growth in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and the improvement of students' learning outcomes in the context of MOOC-based and AI-powered flipped teaching and assessment of EFL writing (MAFTA). Design/methodology/approach: Three college EFL teachers and their students (66 in total) participated in three cycles of MAFTA instruction. Triangulated analysis was conducted by considering all relevant data sources, including the teachers' discussions and reflections, the argumentative essays produced by the students before and after the MAFTA instruction, as well as the data gathered through questionnaires and interviews. Findings: The three teachers demonstrated varying degrees of growth in TPACK, as evidenced by their increased knowledge of the technology tools and skills in utilizing the tools to realize their pedagogical beliefs on teaching EFL writing. Substantial improvements were detected in students' essays. The students generally have affirmative perceptions on the MAFTA model and the questionnaire and interviews specified the benefits they gained from each stage of the model. Originality/value: Firstly, the lesson study is grounded in an innovative approach to teaching EFL writing that incorporates multiple technological affordances. Secondly, it closely scrutinizes the dynamics of both teachers' and students' growths during the innovative practice. The findings could offer insights into teachers' TPACK development and effective integration of technological advancements in EFL education at the tertiary level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One study (n = 1) aimed to improve teaching and learning through a focus on AI-assisted flipped instruction and its effect on teacher TPACK and student writing outcomes.
“One study (n = 1) aimed to improve teaching and learning through a focus on AI-assisted flipped instruction and its effect on teacher TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) and student writing outcomes (Zhang, 2024).”
From The Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in English Academic Writing among University Students: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2024
Cites
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882231162868 · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Technology and the future of language teaching
Kessler, G. (2018) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12318 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Zhao, X. (2023) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882221094089 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review
Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Bo, Z., Pek, L. S., Jian, L., Cong, W., & Nan, L. T. (2025) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2025.53.05 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing International Studies University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Yumei
- ORCID
- Zhang, Yumei
- Venue
- International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2024-01-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-40
- ISSN
- 2046-8253 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390847716
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- lesson study, flipped classroom, EFL writing, TPACK, teacher professional development, learning outcomes, argumentative essay writing, college English teachers, technology integration in language teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review