The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green lean and the need for Six Sigma
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to critically review the green lean approach and highlight its limitations; examine the compatibility of the green, lean and Six Sigma concepts; and propose Six Sigma, and specially its problem-solving methodology DMAIC, as an approach to help enhancing the effectiveness of green lean initiatives. Historically, profitability and efficiency, and more recently customer satisfaction, quality and responsiveness objectives have been the prevailing interest for organisations. However, the move towards greener operations and products has forced companies to seek alternatives to combine these with green objectives and initiatives. Green lean is the result of this combination. Thus, the paper conceptually proposes Green Lean Six Sigma. Design/methodology/approach: – To do this, a systematic literature review (SLR) of the subjects under investigation was conducted. Findings: – The SLR indicated that the green lean integration may have inherited the same limitations as the individual green and lean approaches, but these may be overcome through the integration of Six Sigma. It also identified the similarities of some of the main attributes of green, lean and Six Sigma, which suggest their compatibility to be unified as an integrated approach. Practical implications: – The paper allows scholars to develop a deeper and richer knowledge on the simultaneous deployment of green and operational improvement initiatives and help practitioners in formulating more effective strategies for their deployment. Originality/value: – The paper is one of the very first researches that investigate the potential benefits of integrating green lean and Six Sigma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Introduction to Statistical Quality Control
Sauter, R. M., & Montgomery, D. C. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269251 · Cited by 7,842
Sustainable Operations Management
Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & VanWassenhove, L. N. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00235.x · Cited by 1,746
Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking
Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570410558049 · Cited by 1,664
Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-H. (2008) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029 · Cited by 1,553
Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance
Green, K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Meacham, J., & Bhadauria, V. S. (2012) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541211227126 · Cited by 1,476
A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management
Sarkis, J. (2003) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00062-8 · Cited by 1,403
Environmental technologies and competitive advantage
Shrivastava, P. (1995) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250160923 · Cited by 1,347
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036232009 · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis
Bhatt, Y., Ghuman, K., & Dhir, A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120988 · Cited by 303
The effect of lean methods and tools on the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations
Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Chaikittisilp, S., & Tan, K. H. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.030 · Cited by 277
“In addition, Garza-Reyes (2015b), Garza-Reyes et al. (2014) and Carvalho et al. (2011) mention that some of the waste reduction objectives of lean are ‘naturally’ aligned to good environmental practices.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Garza-Reyes, J. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-08-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226-248
- ISSN
- 2040-4166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1569395187
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 31.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijlss-04-2014-0010
- The paper
- Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-04-2014-0010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.