Cited by 69Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationQuality and Supply Management

Implementation of lean in health care environments: an update of systematic reviews

Open access
Lima, Rui M., Dinis-Carvalho, José, Souza, Thiago A., Vieira, Elisa, Gonçalves, Bruno·2021·International Journal of Lean Six Sigma

Abstract

Purpose Even though the implementation of lean in health care environments is relatively recent, it has been receiving a lot of attention in recent years. Partly because of the fact that it is a recent field of practise and research and partly because the number of works developed in this field has grown rapidly, it is important to frequently update the perspectives on this field of investigation. Thus, this study aims to review the implementation of lean tools and techniques applied to hospital organizational areas in a five-year period, between 2014 and 2018, complementing some of the most relevant reviews already published. The most important criteria such as tools, methods and principles, hospital areas intervened, improvements and difficulties were assessed and quantified. Design/methodology/approach As starting point for this systematic literature review (SLR), a set of selected pre-existing review publications was used to support the current study and as the ground base for the expansion of the studies about lean health care. The current study contemplated 114 articles from a five-year period between 2014 and 2018. A subset of 58 of these articles was critically assessed to understand the application of lean tools and methods in different hospital areas. Findings The thorough analysis of selected articles show a lack of works in continuous improvement approaches when compared to the application of production organization methods, visual management and diagnosing and pr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijlss-07-2019-0074

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lima, R. M., Dinis-Carvalho, J., Souza, T. A., Vieira, E., & Gonçalves, B.
Affiliations
Centro ALGORITMI (PT)
Venue
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-07-21
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
399-431
ISSN
2040-4166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044867892
Cited by
69
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Lean Six Sigma (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
lean implementation, continuous improvement, visual management, problem-solving tools, patient flow, organizational culture change, sustainability of improvement, hospital management, waste reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review